Multiplex PCR test as an intra-operative diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection in presumed aseptic revision hip and knee arthroplasty: a 1-year follow-up study of 200 cases
-
Published:2024-01-24
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:9-16
-
ISSN:2206-3552
-
Container-title:Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Bone Joint Infect.
Author:
van Schaik Thomas J. A.,Heesterbeek Petra J. C.,van Susante Job L. C.,Rijnen Wim H. C.,Goosen Jon H. M.
Abstract
Abstract. Automated custom-made multiplex PCR techniques (mPCR) have become commercially available and are designed for intra-operative screening of concurrent periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of a positive mPCR test in presumed aseptic revision total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasties after a 1-year follow-up. In an earlier study, such an automated mPCR technique (Unyvero ITI G2; Curetis, Holzgerlingen, Germany) was tested on intra-operatively obtained synovial fluid in 200 patients with a presumed aseptic TKA or THA revision. At the time of revision, no therapeutic consequences were attached to a positive test result since treating personnel were blinded for the test results. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of cases with respect to the occurrence of PJIs using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria during a 1-year follow-up postoperatively. A total of 10 out of 200 patients had a positive mPCR test result at the time of revision. Of these 10 cases, none encountered outcome parameters fulfilling the criteria to diagnose PJIs in the first year after surgery, and one required re-revision surgery for reasons other than infection. Of the other 190 negative mPCR cases, none developed a PJI. A positive mPCR test at the time of presumed aseptic revision surgery did not correspond with intra-operatively obtained tissue cultures, and none of the encountered positive mPCR tests had developed a PJI at the 1-year follow-up. We recommend careful evaluation and monitoring of modern diagnostic tests before widespread use.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference39 articles.
1. Aamot, H. V., Johnsen, B. O., and Skråmm, I.: Rapid diagnostics of orthopedic implant-associated infections using Unyvero ITI implant and tissue infection application is not optimal for Staphylococcus species identification, BMC Res. Notes., 12, 725, https://doi.org/10.1186/S13104-019-4755-5, 2019. 2. Auñón, Á., Coifman, I., Blanco, A., García Cañete, J., Parrón-Cambero, R., and Esteban, J.: Usefulness of a Multiplex PCR Assay for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections in the Routine Setting, Orthop. Surg., 14, 383–388, https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13187, 2022. 3. Borde, J. P., Häcker, G. A., Guschl, S., Serr, A., Danner, T., Hübner, J., Burrack-Lange, S., Lüdke, G., Helwig, P., Hauschild, O., and Kern, W. V.: Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections using UMD-Universal Kit and the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI® cartridge system: a pilot study, Infection, 43, 551–560, https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-015-0796-4, 2015. 4. Corvec, S., Portillo, M. E., Pasticci, B. M., Borens, O., and Trampuz, A.: Epidemiology and new developments in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection, Int. J. Artif. Organs, 35, 923–934, https://doi.org/10.5301/IJAO.5000168, 2012. 5. Fernandez-Sampedro, M., Salas-Venero, C., Fariñas-Álvarez, C., Sumillera, M., Pérez-Carro, L., Fakkas-Fernandez, M., Gómez-Román, J., Martínez-Martínez, L., and Fariñas, M. C. M.: Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening, BMC Infect. Dis., 15, 232, https://doi.org/10.1186/S12879-015-0976-Y, 2015.
|
|