Calibration of a water vapour Raman lidar with a kite-based humidity sensor
-
Published:2016-03-15
Issue:3
Volume:9
Page:1083-1094
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Totems JulienORCID, Chazette PatrickORCID
Abstract
Abstract. We present a calibration method for a water vapour Raman lidar using a meteorological probe lifted by a kite, flown steadily above the lidar site, within the framework of the Hydrological Cycle in the Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) and Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment (ChArMEx) campaigns. The experiment was carried out in Menorca (Spain) during June 2013, using the mobile water vapour and aerosol lidar WALI. Calibration using a kite demonstrated a much better degree of co-location with the lidar system than that which could be achieved with radiosondes, and it allowed us to determine the overlap function and calibration factor simultaneously. The range-dependent water vapour lidar calibration was thus determined with an uncertainty of 2 % in the 90–8000 m altitude range. Lidar water vapour measurements are further compared with radiosondes, showing very good agreement in the lower troposphere (1–5 km) and a relative difference and standard deviation of 5 and 9 % respectively. Moreover, a reasonable agreement with MODIS-integrated water vapour content is found, with a relative mean and standard deviation of 3 and 16 % respectively. However, a discrepancy is found with AERONET retrievals, showing the latter to be underestimated by 28 %. Reanalyses by the ECMWF/IFS numerical weather prediction model also agree with the temporal evolution highlighted with the lidar, with no measurable drift in integrated water vapour content over the period.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference45 articles.
1. Behrendt, A., Wulfmeyer, V., Riede, A., Wagner, G., Pal, S., Bauer, H.,
Radlach, M., and Späth, F.: 3-Dimensional observations of atmospheric
humidity with a scanning differential absorption lidar, in: Proc. SPIE Vol.
7475, Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere XIV, edited by
R. H. Picard, K. Schäfer, A. Comeron, and M. van Weele, 74750L,
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.835143, 2009. 2. Bhawar, R., Di Girolamo, P., Summa, D., Flamant, C., Althausen, D.,
Behrendt, A., Kiemle, C., Bosser, P., Cacciani, M., Champollion, C., Di
Iorio, T., Engelmann, R., Herold, C., Müller, D., Pal, S., Wirth, M., and
Wulfmeyer, V.: The water vapour intercomparison effort in the framework of
the convective and orographically-induced precipitation study:
airborne-to-ground-based and airborne-to-airborne lidar systems, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 137, 345–348, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.697, 2011. 3. Bock, O., Bosser, P., Bourcy, T., David, L., Goutail, F., Hoareau, C.,
Keckhut, P., Legain, D., Pazmino, A., Pelon, J., Pipis, K., Poujol, G.,
Sarkissian, A., Thom, C., Tournois, G., and Tzanos, D.: Accuracy assessment
of water vapour measurements from in situ and remote sensing techniques
during the DEMEVAP 2011 campaign at OHP, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2777–2802,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2777-2013, 2013. 4. Boylan, J. W. and Russell, A. G.: PM and light extinction model performance
metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models, Atmos.
Environ., 40, 4946–4959, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.087, 2006. 5. Chazette, P., Marnas, F., and Totems, J.: The mobile Water vapor Aerosol
Raman LIdar and its implication in the framework of the HyMeX and ChArMEx
programs: application to a dust transport process, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7,
1629–1647, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1629-2014, 2014a.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|