Measuring the 3-D wind vector with a weight-shift microlight aircraft
Author:
Metzger S.,Junkermann W.,Butterbach-Bahl K.,Schmid H. P.,Foken T.
Abstract
Abstract. This study investigates whether the 3-D wind vector can be measured reliably from a highly transportable and low-cost weight-shift microlight aircraft. Therefore we draw up a transferable procedure to accommodate flow distortion originating from the aircraft body and -wing. This procedure consists of the analysis of aircraft dynamics and seven successive calibration steps. For our aircraft the horizontal wind components receive their greatest single amendment (14%, relative to the initial uncertainty) from the correction of flow distortion magnitude in the dynamic pressure computation. Conversely the vertical wind component is most of all improved (31%) by subsequent steps considering the 3-D flow distortion distribution in the flow angle computations. Therein the influences of the aircraft's aeroelastic wing (53%), as well as sudden changes in wing loading (16%) are considered by using the measured lift coefficient as explanatory variable. Three independent lines of analysis are used to evaluate the quality of the wind measurement: (a) A wind tunnel study in combination with the propagation of sensor uncertainties defines the systems input uncertainty to ≈0.6 m s−1 at the extremes of a 95% confidence interval. (b) During severe vertical flight manoeuvres the deviation range of the vertical wind component does not exceed 0.3 m s−1. (c) The comparison with ground based wind measurements yields an overall operational uncertainty (root mean square deviation) of ≈0.4 m s−1 for the horizontal and ≈0.3 m s−1 for the vertical wind components. No conclusive dependence of the uncertainty on the wind magnitude (<8 m s−1) or true airspeed (ranging from 23–30 m s−1) is found. Hence our analysis provides the necessary basis to study the wind measurement precision and spectral quality, which is prerequisite for reliable eddy-covariance flux measurements.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference40 articles.
1. Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D., Running, S., Anthoni, P., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K., Evans, R., Fuentes, J., Goldstein, A., Katul, G., Law, B., Lee, X., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Munger, W., Oechel, W. U. K., Pilegaard, K., Schmid, H., Valentini, R., Verma, S., Vesala, T., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.: FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 2415–2434, 2001. 2. Bange, J. and Roth, R.: Helicopter-borne flux measurements in the nocturnal boundary layer over land – a case study, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 92, 295–325, 1999. 3. Beyrich, F., Leps, J. P., Mauder, M., Bange, J., Foken, T., Huneke, S., Lohse, H., Ludi, A., Meijninger, W. M. L., Mironov, D., Weisensee, U., and Zittel, P.: Area-averaged surface fluxes over the litfass region based on eddy-covariance measurements, Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 121, 33–65, 2006. 4. Bissolli, P. and Dittmann, E.: The objective weather type classification of the German Weather Service and its possibilities of application to environmental and meteorological investigations, Meteorol. Z., 10, 253–260, 2001. 5. Bohn, D. and Simon, H.: Mehrparametrige Approximation der Eichr{ä}ume und Eichfl{ä}chen von Unterschall- bzw. {Ü}berschall-5-Loch-Sonden, Archiv f{ü}r Technisches Messen und Me{ß}technische Praxis, 470, 31–37, 1975.
|
|