Divergent convective outflow in large-eddy simulations
-
Published:2023-06-02
Issue:11
Volume:23
Page:6065-6081
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Groot EdwardORCID, Tost HolgerORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Upper-tropospheric outflow is analysed in cloud-resolving large-eddy simulations.
Thereby, the role of convective organization, latent heating, and other factors in upper-tropospheric divergent-outflow variability from deep convection is diagnosed using a set of more than 80 large-eddy simulations because the outflows are thought to be an important feedback from (organized) deep convection to large-scale atmospheric flows; perturbations in those outflows may sometimes propagate into larger-scale perturbations. Upper-tropospheric divergence is found to be controlled by net latent heating and convective organization. At low precipitation rates isolated convective cells have a stronger mass divergence than squall lines. The squall line divergence is the weakest (relative to the net latent heating) when the outflow is purely 2D in the case of an infinite-length squall line.
At high precipitation rates the mass divergence discrepancy between the various modes of convection reduces. Hence, overall, the magnitude of divergent outflow is explained by the latent heating and the dimensionality of the outflow, which together create a non-linear relation.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference36 articles.
1. Baumgart, M., Ghinassi, P., Wirth, V., Selz, T., Craig, G. C., and Riemer, M.:
Quantitative View on the Processes Governing the Upscale Error Growth up to
the Planetary Scale Using a Stochastic Convection Scheme, Mon. Weather
Rev., 147, 1713–1731, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-18-0292.1, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f 2. Bierdel, L., Selz, T., and Craig, G.: Theoretical aspects of upscale error
growth through the mesoscales: an analytical model, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 3048–3059, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3160, 2017. a, b 3. Bierdel, L., Selz, T., and Craig, G. C.: Theoretical aspects of upscale error
growth on the mesoscales: Idealized numerical simulations, Q. J.
Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 682–694, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3236,
2018. a, b 4. Bretherton, C. S. and Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: Gravity Waves, Compensating
Subsidence and Detrainment around Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos.
Sci., 46, 740–759,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<0740:GWCSAD>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l 5. Bryan, G.: Cloud Model 1, Version 19.8/cm1r19.8, NCAR [code],
https://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/people/bryan/cm1/ (last access:
10 January 2023), 2019. a, b
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|