Effects of precipitation seasonality, irrigation, vegetation cycle and soil type on enhanced weathering – modeling of cropland case studies across four sites
-
Published:2022-08-26
Issue:16
Volume:19
Page:3877-3896
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Cipolla GiuseppeORCID, Calabrese SalvatoreORCID, Porporato AmilcareORCID, Noto Leonardo V.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Enhanced weathering (EW) is a promising strategy for carbon sequestration, but several open questions remain regarding the actual rates of dissolution in conditions of natural hydroclimatic variability in comparison to laboratory experiments. In this context, models play a pivotal role, as they allow exploring and predicting EW dynamics under different environmental conditions. Here a comprehensive hydro-biogeochemical model has been applied to four cropland case studies (i.e., Sicily and the Padan plain in Italy and California and Iowa in the USA) characterized by different rainfall seasonality, vegetation (i.e., wheat for Sicily and California and corn for the Padan plain and Iowa), and soil type to explore their influence on dissolution rates. The results reveal that rainfall seasonality and irrigation when applied are crucial in determining EW and carbon sequestration dynamics, given their effect on hydrological fluxes, soil pH and weathering rate. The carbon sequestration rate was found to be strongly affected also by the background weathering flux, which is one of the main factors controlling soil pH before the olivine amendment. Regarding the US case studies, Iowa sequesters the greatest amount of CO2 if compared to California (4.20 and 2.21 kg ha−1 yr−1, respectively), and the same happens for Sicily with respect to the Padan plain (0.62 and 0.39 kg ha−1 yr−1, respectively). These low carbon sequestration values suggest that an in-depth analysis at the global scale is required to assess EW efficacy for carbon sequestration.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference58 articles.
1. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration
– Guidelines for computing crop water requirements – FAO Irrigation and
drainage paper 56, FAO, ISBN 92-5-104219-5, 1998. a 2. Amann, T., Hartmann, J., Struyf, E., de Oliveira Garcia, W., Fischer, E. K.,
Janssens, I., Meire, P., and Schoelynck, J.: Enhanced Weathering and related
element fluxes – a cropland mesocosm approach, Biogeosciences, 17, 103–119,
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-103-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l 3. Asibor, J. O., Clough, P. T., Nabavi, S. A., and Manovic, V.: Assessment of
optimal conditions for the performance of greenhouse gas removal methods,
J. Environ. Manag., 294, 113039,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113039, 2021. a 4. Ballabio, C., Lugato, E., Fernández-Ugalde, O., Orgiazzi, A., Jones, A.,
Borrelli, P., Montanarella, L., and Panagos, P.: Mapping LUCAS topsoil
chemical properties at European scale using Gaussian process regression,
Geoderma, 355, 113912,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113912, 2019. a, b, c 5. Bandstra, J. Z., Buss, H. L., Campen, R., Liermann, L., Moore, J., Hausrath,
E., Navarre-Sitchler, A., Jang, J., and Brantley, S.: Appendix: Compilation
of mineral dissolution rates, in: Kinetics of Water–Rock Interaction,
737–823, New York, Springer, 2008. a
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|