Coupled wind turbine design and layout optimization with nonhomogeneous wind turbines
-
Published:2019-01-30
Issue:1
Volume:4
Page:99-114
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Stanley Andrew P. J., Ning AndrewORCID
Abstract
Abstract. In this study, wind farms were optimized to show the benefit of coupling
complete turbine design and layout optimization as well as including two
different turbine designs in a fixed 1-to-1 ratio in a single wind farm. For
our purposes, the variables in each turbine optimization include hub height,
rotor diameter, rated power, tower diameter, tower shell thickness, and
implicit blade chord-and-twist distributions. A 32-turbine wind farm and a
60-turbine wind farm were both considered, as well as a variety of turbine
spacings and wind shear exponents. Structural constraints as well as turbine
costs were considered in the optimization. Results indicate that coupled
turbine design and layout optimization is superior to sequentially optimizing
turbine design, then turbine layout. Coupled optimization results in an
additional 2 %–5 % reduction in the cost of energy compared to
optimizing sequentially for wind farms with turbine spacings of 8.5–11 rotor
diameters. Smaller wind farms benefit even more from coupled optimization.
Furthermore, wind farms with closely spaced wind turbines can greatly benefit
from nonuniform turbine design throughout the farm. Some of these wind farms
with heterogeneous turbine design have an additional 10 % cost-of-energy
reduction compared to wind farms with identical turbines throughout the farm.
Funder
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference34 articles.
1. Barthelmie, R. J., Frandsen, S. T., Nielsen, M., Pryor, S., Rethore, P.-E.,
and
Jørgensen, H. E.: Modelling and measurements of power losses and
turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind
farm, Wind Energy, 10, 517–528, 2007. a 2. Barthelmie, R. J., Hansen, K., Frandsen, S. T., Rathmann, O., Schepers, J.,
Schlez, W., Phillips, J., Rados, K., Zervos, A., Politis, E. S., and Chaviaropoulos, P. K.:
Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms
offshore, Wind Energy, 12, 431–444, 2009. a 3. Brand, A., Wagenaar, J., Eecen, P., and Holtslag, M.: Database of
measurements
on the offshore wind farm Egmond aan Zee, EWEA, Copenhagen, 2012. a 4. Briggs, K.: Navigating the complexities of wake losses, Norik American
Windpower, 10, 2013. a 5. Chen, Y., Li, H., Jin, K., and Song, Q.: Wind farm layout optimization using
genetic algorithm with different hub height wind turbines, Energ. Convers.
Manage., 70, 56–65, 2013. a, b
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|