Importance of different parameterization changes for the updated dust cycle modeling in the Community Atmosphere Model (version 6.1)
-
Published:2022-11-16
Issue:22
Volume:15
Page:8181-8219
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Li Longlei, Mahowald Natalie M., Kok Jasper F.ORCID, Liu Xiaohong, Wu MingxuanORCID, Leung Danny M.ORCID, Hamilton Douglas S.ORCID, Emmons Louisa K.ORCID, Huang YueORCID, Sexton Neil, Meng JunORCID, Wan JessicaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Community Atmosphere Model (CAM6.1), the atmospheric component
of the Community Earth System Model (CESM; version 2.1), simulates the
life cycle (emission, transport, and deposition) of mineral dust and its
interactions with physio-chemical components to quantify the impacts of dust
on climate and the Earth system. The accuracy of such quantifications relies
on how well dust-related processes are represented in the model. Here we
update the parameterizations for the dust module, including those on the
dust emission scheme, the aerosol dry deposition scheme, the size
distribution of transported dust, and the treatment of dust particle shape.
Multiple simulations were undertaken to evaluate the model performance
against diverse observations, and to understand how each update alters the
modeled dust cycle and the simulated dust direct radiative effect. The
model–observation comparisons suggest that substantially improved model
representations of the dust cycle are achieved primarily through the new
more physically-based dust emission scheme. In comparison, the other
modifications induced small changes to the modeled dust cycle and
model–observation comparisons, except the size distribution of dust in the
coarse mode, which can be even more influential than that of replacing the
dust emission scheme. We highlight which changes introduced here are
important for which regions, shedding light on further dust model
developments required for more accurately estimating interactions between
dust and climate.
Funder
U.S. Department of Energy National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference150 articles.
1. Adebiyi, A. A. and Kok, J. F.: Climate models miss most of the coarse dust
in the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 6, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9507, 2020. 2. Adebiyi, A. A., Kok, J. F., Wang, Y., Ito, A., Ridley, D. A., Nabat, P., and Zhao, C: Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis – DustCOMM Version 1, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2620475, 2019. 3. Adebiyi, A. A., Kok, J. F., Wang, Y., Ito, A., Ridley, D. A., Nabat, P., and Zhao, C.: Dust Constraints from joint Observational-Modelling-experiMental analysis (DustCOMM): comparison with measurements and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 829–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-829-2020, 2020. 4. Albani, S., Mahowald, N. M., Perry, A. T., Scanza, R. A., Zender, C. S.,
Heavens, N. G., Maggi, V., Kok, J. F. and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 541–570, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000279, 2014. 5. Ansmann, A., Petzold, A., Kandler, K., Tegen, I., Wendisch, M., Müller,
D., Weinzierl, B., Müller, T., and Heintzenberg, J.: Saharan Mineral Dust
Experiments SAMUM-1 and SAMUM-2: What have we learned?, Tellus B, 63, 403–429, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00555.x,
2011.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|