Ground-based lidar processing and simulator framework for comparing models and observations (ALCF 1.0)
-
Published:2021-01-06
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:43-72
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Kuma PeterORCID, McDonald Adrian J., Morgenstern OlafORCID, Querel RichardORCID, Silber IsraelORCID, Flynn Connor J.
Abstract
Abstract. Automatic lidars and ceilometers (ALCs) provide valuable information on cloud and aerosols but have not been systematically used in the evaluation of general circulation models (GCMs) and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. Obstacles associated with the diversity of instruments, a lack of standardisation of data products and open processing tools mean that the value of large ALC networks worldwide is not being realised. We discuss a tool, called the
Automatic Lidar and Ceilometer Framework (ALCF), that overcomes these problems and also includes a ground-based lidar simulator, which calculates the radiative transfer of laser radiation and allows one-to-one comparison with models. Our ground-based lidar simulator is based on the Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison
Project (CFMIP) Observation Simulator Package (COSP), which has been extensively used for spaceborne lidar intercomparisons. The ALCF
implements all steps needed to transform and calibrate raw ALC data and create simulated
attenuated volume backscattering coefficient profiles for one-to-one comparison and complete statistical analysis of clouds. The framework supports multiple common
commercial ALCs (Vaisala CL31, CL51, Lufft CHM 15k and Droplet Measurement Technologies MiniMPL), reanalyses (JRA-55,
ERA5 and MERRA-2) and models (the Unified Model and AMPS – the Antarctic Mesoscale Prediction System). To demonstrate its
capabilities, we present case studies evaluating cloud in the
supported reanalyses and models using CL31, CL51, CHM 15k and MiniMPL
observations at three sites in New Zealand. We show that the reanalyses
and models generally underestimate cloud fraction.
If sufficiently high-temporal-resolution model output is available (better than 6-hourly), a direct comparison of
individual clouds is also possible. We demonstrate that the ALCF can be used as a generic
evaluation tool to examine cloud occurrence and cloud properties in reanalyses, NWP models, and GCMs, potentially utilising the large amounts of ALC data already available. This tool is likely to be particularly useful for the analysis and improvement of low-level cloud simulations which are not well monitored from space. This has previously been identified as a critical deficiency in contemporary models, limiting the accuracy of weather forecasts and future climate projections.
While the current focus of the framework is on clouds, support for aerosol in the
lidar simulator is planned in the future.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference139 articles.
1. Baars, H., Kanitz, T., Engelmann, R., Althausen, D., Heese, B., Komppula, M., Preißler, J., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Wandinger, U., Lim, J.-H., Ahn, J. Y., Stachlewska, I. S., Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Seifert, P., Hofer, J., Skupin, A., Schneider, F., Bohlmann, S., Foth, A., Bley, S., Pfüller, A., Giannakaki, E., Lihavainen, H., Viisanen, Y., Hooda, R. K., Pereira, S. N., Bortoli, D., Wagner, F., Mattis, I., Janicka, L., Markowicz, K. M., Achtert, P., Artaxo, P., Pauliquevis, T., Souza, R. A. F., Sharma, V. P., van Zyl, P. G., Beukes, J. P., Sun, J., Rohwer, E. G., Deng, R., Mamouri, R.-E., and Zamorano, F.: An overview of the first decade of PollyNET: an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5111–5137, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5111-2016, 2016. a 2. Baran, A. J.: A review of the light scattering properties of cirrus, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 1239–1260,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.026, 2009. a 3. Bastin, S., Chiriaco, M., and Drobinski, P.: Control of radiation and
evaporation on temperature variability in a WRF regional climate simulation:
comparison with colocated long term ground based observations near Paris,
Clim. Dynam., 51, 985–1003, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-2974-1, 2018. a 4. Bi, L., Yang, P., Kattawar, G. W., Baum, B. A., Hu, Y. X., Winker, D. M.,
Brock, R. S., and Lu, J. Q.: Simulation of the color ratio associated with
the backscattering of radiation by ice particles at the wavelengths of 0.532
and 1.064 µm, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00H08,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011759, 2009. a 5. Bodas-Salcedo, A., Webb, M., Bony, S., Chepfer, H., Dufresne, J.-L., Klein, S.,
Zhang, Y., Marchand, R., Haynes, J., Pincus, R., and John, V. O.: COSP: Satellite
simulation software for model assessment, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1023–1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1, 2011. a
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|