Abstract
Abstract. To keep the Earth system in a desirable region of its state space, such as the recently suggested "tolerable environment and development window", "planetary boundaries", or "safe (and just) operating space", one not only needs to understand the quantitative internal dynamics of the system and the available options for influencing it (management), but also the structure of the system's state space with regard to certain qualitative differences. Important questions are: which state space regions can be reached from which others with or without leaving the desirable region? Which regions are in a variety of senses "safe" to stay in when management options might break away, and which qualitative decision problems may occur as a consequence of this topological structure? In this article, as a complement to the existing literature on optimal control which is more focussed on quantitative optimization and is much applied in both the engineering and the integrated assessment literature, we develop a mathematical theory of the qualitative topology of the state space of a dynamical system with management options and desirable states. We suggest a certain terminology for the various resulting regions of the state space and perform a detailed formal classification of the possible states with respect to the possibility of avoiding or leaving the undesired region. Our results indicate that before performing some form of quantitative optimization, the sustainable management of the Earth system may require decisions of a more discrete type that come in the form of several dilemmata, e.g., choosing between eventual safety and uninterrupted desirability, or between uninterrupted safety and increasing flexibility. We illustrate the concepts and dilemmata with conceptual models from classical mechanics, climate science, ecology, economics, and coevolutionary Earth system modelling and discuss their potential relevance for the climate and sustainability debate.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reference25 articles.
1. Anderies, J. M., Carpenter, S. R., Steffen, W., and Rockström, J.: The topology of non-linear global carbon dynamics: from tipping points to planetary boundaries, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 044048, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044048, 2013.
2. Aubin, J.-P.: Viability kernels and capture basins of sets under differential inclusions, SIAM J.Control Optim., 40, 853–881, https://doi.org/10.1137/S036301290036968X, 2001.
3. Aubin, J.-P.: Viability Theory, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2009.
4. Aubin, J.-P. and Saint-Pierre, P.: An introduction to viability theory and management of renewable resources, in: Advanced Methods for Decision Making and Risk Management in Sustainability Science, edited by: Kropp, J. and Scheffran, J., chap. 2, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 43–80, 2007.
5. Aubin, J.-P., Bayen, A., and Saint-Pierre, P.: Viability Theory. New Directions, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.