Profile-based estimated inversion strength
-
Published:2023-03-13
Issue:5
Volume:23
Page:3247-3266
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Wang Zhenquan, Yuan Jian, Wood RobertORCID, Chen Yifan, Tong Tiancheng
Abstract
Abstract. To better measure the planetary boundary layer inversion strength (IS), a novel profile-based method of estimated inversion strength (EISp) is developed using the ERA5 daily reanalysis data. The EISp is designed to estimate the IS based on the thinnest possible reanalysis layer above the lifting condensation level encompassing the inversion layer.
At a ground-based site in North America, the EISp correlates better
with the radiosonde-detected IS (R=0.74) than the lower-tropospheric
stability (LTS, R=0.53) and the estimated inversion strength (EIS,
R=0.45). The daily variance in low cloud cover (LCC) explained by the
EISp is twice that explained by the LTS and EIS. Higher correlations
between the EISp and the radiosonde-detected IS are also found at other radiosonde stations of the subtropics and midlatitudes. Analysis of LCC observed by geostationary satellites and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer shows that the EISp explains
78 % of the annual mean LCC spatial variance over global oceans and land, which is larger than that explained by the LTS and EIS (48 % and 13 %). Over tropical and subtropical low-cloud-prevailing eastern oceans, the LCC range is more resolved by the EISp (48 %) than by the LTS and EIS (37 % and 36 %). Furthermore, the
EISp explains a larger fraction (32 %) in the daily LCC variance as compared to that explained by the LTS and EIS (14 % and 16 %). The seasonal LCC variance explained by the EISp is 89 %, which is larger than that explained by the LTS and EIS (80 % and 70 %). The LCC–EISp relationship is more uniform across various timescales than the LCC–LTS and LCC–EIS relationships. It is suggested that the EISp is a better cloud-controlling factor for LCC and is likely a useful external environmental constraint for process-level studies in which there is a need to control for large-scale meteorology in order to isolate the cloud responses to aerosols on short timescales.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference55 articles.
1. Ackerman, T. P. and Stokes, G. M.: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
Program, Physics Today, 56, 38–44, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1554135, 2003. 2. Albrecht, B. A., Jensen, M. P., and Syrett, W. J.: Marine boundary layer
structure and fractional cloudiness, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14209–14222, https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00827, 1995. 3. Bretherton, C. S. and Wyant, M. C.: Moisture Transport, Lower-Tropospheric
Stability, and Decoupling of Cloud-Topped Boundary Layers, J.
Atmos. Sci., 54, 148–167, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0148:Mtltsa>2.0.Co;2, 1997. 4. Bretherton, C. S., Widmann, M., Dymnikov, V. P., Wallace, J. M., and
Bladé, I.: The Effective Number of Spatial Degrees of Freedom of a
Time-Varying Field, J. Climate, 12, 1990–2009, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1990:Tenosd>2.0.Co;2, 1999. 5. Bretherton, C. S., Uttal, T., Fairall, C. W., Yuter, S. E., Weller, R. A.,
Baumgardner, D., Comstock, K., Wood, R., and Raga, G. B.: The Epic 2001
Stratocumulus Study, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85,
967–978, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-85-7-967, 2004.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|