Reduced fine sediment flux and channel change in response to the managed
diversion of an upland river channel
-
Published:2016-09-02
Issue:3
Volume:4
Page:705-719
-
ISSN:2196-632X
-
Container-title:Earth Surface Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Surf. Dynam.
Author:
Perks Matthew ThomasORCID, Warburton Jeff
Abstract
Abstract. This paper describes the implementation of a novel mitigation approach and subsequent adaptive management, designed to reduce the transfer of fine sediment (< 2 mm) in Glaisdale Beck, a small, predominantly upland catchment in the UK. Hydro-meteorological and suspended sediment data sets are collected over a 2-year period spanning pre- and post-diversion periods in order to assess the impact of the channel reconfiguration scheme on the fluvial suspended sediment dynamics. Analysis of the river response demonstrates that the fluvial sediment system has become more restrictive with reduced fine sediment transfer. This is characterized by reductions in flow-weighted mean suspended sediment concentrations from 77.93 mg L−1 prior to mitigation, to 74.36 mg L−1 following the diversion. A Mann–Whitney U test found statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between the pre- and post-monitoring median suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs). Whilst application of one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on the coefficients of sediment rating curves developed before and after the diversion found statistically significant differences (p < 0.001), with both Loga and b coefficients becoming smaller following the diversion. Non-parametric analysis indicates a reduction in residuals through time (p < 0.001), with the developed LOWESS model over-predicting sediment concentrations as the channel stabilizes. However, the channel is continuing to adjust to the reconfigured morphology, with evidence of a headward propagating knickpoint which has migrated 120 m at an exponentially decreasing rate over the last 7 years since diversion. The study demonstrates that channel reconfiguration can be effective in mitigating fine sediment flux in headwater streams but the full value of this may take many years to achieve whilst the fluvial system slowly readjusts.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Geophysics
Reference96 articles.
1. Angulo-Martínez, M., López-Vicente, M., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., and Beguería, S.: Mapping rainfall erosivity at a regional scale: a comparison of interpolation methods in the Ebro Basin (NE Spain), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1907–1920, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1907-2009, 2009. 2. Arnold-Forster, D.: Benefits to environment and economy through EU structural funds, with special reference to the North York Moors National Park, Joint Nature Conservation Committee, JNCC Report No. 319, in: The British Uplands: Dynamics of Change, edited by: Burt, T. P., Thompson, D. B. A., and Warburton, J., ISSN: 0963-8091, 83–90, 2002. 3. Asselman, N. E. M.: Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves, J. Hydrol., 234, 228–248, 2000. 4. Atherden, M.: Upland Britain: A Natural History, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 224 pp., 1992. 5. Bilotta, G. S., Krueger, T., Brazier, R. E., Butler, P., Freer, J., Hawkins, J. M. B., Haygarth, P. M., Macleod, C. J. A., and Quinton, J. N.: Assessing catchment-scale erosion and yields of suspended solids from improved temperate grassland, J. Environ. Monitor., 12, 731–739, 2010.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|