Ecological boundaries: a derivative of ecological entities
-
Published:2014-07-22
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:27-37
-
ISSN:1399-1183
-
Container-title:Web Ecology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Web Ecol.
Abstract
Abstract. Defining ecological boundary as an outer envelope of an ecological entity such as an individual, colony, population, community, an ecosystem, or any other discernible unit provides methodological benefits and should thus enhance existing perspectives and research protocols. I argue that, because boundaries are features of entities, the first step in investigation of boundary structure and properties should involve identification of the entity the presumed boundary of interest belongs to. I use a general perspective where ecological systems are parts of a larger system and themselves are made of subsystems (or entities). Such a general hierarchy of ecological objects offers guidance as to how boundaries can be found for specific systems, and how their investigations might lead to reliable and generalizable insights. In particular, it may help in (a) categorizing types of boundaries based on mechanisms leading to formation of entities; (b) deciding what is and what is not a boundary by clarifying the nature of discontinuities seen in nature (e.g., sharp habitat transitions or weak separation of entities); (c) assisting in selecting fruitful resolution at which boundaries are examined; (d) approaching boundaries in complex, nested systems; and (e) deciding what criteria to use in answering questions about a particular boundary type. To facilitate the above I provide general criteria one may use for identifying ecological entities. Such criteria should assist in focusing on boundaries appropriate for a given research question. Finally, where advancing the theoretical framework for ecological boundaries is concerned, the diversity of boundary types will be better served when reorganized in relation to the concept of entity as discussed below.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference45 articles.
1. Adams, J. R., Vucetich, L. M., Hedrick, P. W., Peterson, R. O., and Vucetich, J. A.: Genomic sweep and potential genetic rescue during limiting environmental conditions in an isolated wolf population, P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci., 278, 3336–3344, 2011. 2. Allen, C. R. and Holling C. S.: Cross-scale structure and the generation of innovation and novelty in discontinuous complex systems, in: Discontinuities in ecosystems and other complex systems, edited by: Allen, C. R. and Holling, C. S., Columbia University Press, New York, 2008. 3. Bandelj, V., Solidoro, C., Curiel, D., Cossarini, G., Canu, D. M., and Rismondo, A.: Fuzziness and heterogeneity of benthic metacommunities in a complex transitional system, Plos One, 1–15, e52395, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052395, 2012. 4. Beisner, B. E., Haydon, D. T., and Cuddington, K.: Alternative stable states in ecology, Front Ecol. Environ., 1, 376–382, 2003. 5. Bertness, M. D. and Callaway, R.: Positive interactions in communities, Trends Ecol. Evol., 9, 191–193, 1994.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|