Rad-cGAN v1.0: Radar-based precipitation nowcasting model with conditional generative adversarial networks for multiple dam domains
-
Published:2022-08-01
Issue:15
Volume:15
Page:5967-5985
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Choi Suyeon, Kim YeonjooORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Numerical weather prediction models and probabilistic
extrapolation methods using radar images have been widely used for
precipitation nowcasting. Recently, machine-learning-based precipitation
nowcasting models have also been actively developed for relatively
short-term precipitation predictions. This study was aimed at developing a
radar-based precipitation nowcasting model using an advanced machine-learning technique, conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN), which
shows high performance in image generation tasks. The cGAN-based
precipitation nowcasting model, named Rad-cGAN, developed in this study was
trained with the radar reflectivity data of the Soyang-gang Dam basin in
South Korea with a spatial domain of 128 × 128 pixels, spatial
resolution of 1 km, and temporal resolution of 10 min. The model performance
was evaluated using previously developed machine-learning-based
precipitation nowcasting models, namely convolutional long short-term memory
(ConvLSTM) and U-Net. In addition, Eulerian persistence model and pySTEPS, a
radar-based deterministic nowcasting system, are used as baseline models. We demonstrated that Rad-cGAN outperformed reference models at 10 min lead
time prediction for the Soyang-gang Dam basin based on verification metrics:
Pearson correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE),
Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), critical success index (CSI), and fraction
skill scores (FSS) at an intensity threshold of 0.1, 1.0, and 5.0 mm h−1.
However, unlike low rainfall intensity, the CSI at high rainfall intensity
in Rad-cGAN deteriorated rapidly beyond the lead time of 10 min; however,
ConvLSTM and baseline models maintained better performances. This
observation was consistent with the FSS calculated at high rainfall
intensity. These results were qualitatively evaluated using typhoon Soulik
as an example, and through this, ConvLSTM maintained relatively higher
precipitation than the other models. However, for the prediction of
precipitation area, Rad-cGAN showed the best results, and the advantage of the
cGAN method to reduce the blurring effect was confirmed through radially
averaged power spectral density (PSD). We also demonstrated the successful
implementation of the transfer learning technique to efficiently train the
model with the data from other dam basins in South Korea, such as the Andong Dam
and Chungju Dam basins. We used the pre-trained model, which was completely
trained in the Soyang-gang Dam basin. Furthermore, we analyzed the amount of
data to effectively develop the model for the new domain through the
transfer learning strategies applying the pre-trained model using data for
additional dam basins. This study confirmed that Rad-cGAN can be
successfully applied to precipitation nowcasting with longer lead times and
using the transfer learning approach showed good performance in dam basins
other than the originally trained basin.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference51 articles.
1. Agrawal, S., Barrington, L., Bromberg, C., Burge, J., Gazen, C., and Hickey,
J.: Machine learning for precipitation nowcasting from radar images, arXiv
[preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.12132, 2019. 2. Ayzel, G., Heistermann, M., and Winterrath, T.: Optical flow models as an open benchmark for radar-based precipitation nowcasting (rainymotion v0.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1387–1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1387-2019, 2019. 3. Ayzel, G., Scheffer, T., and Heistermann, M.: RainNet v1.0: a convolutional neural network for radar-based precipitation nowcasting, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2631–2644, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2631-2020, 2020. 4. Basist, A., Bell, G. D., and Meentemeyer, V.: Statistical relationships between topography and precipitation patterns, J. climate, 7, 1305–1315, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<1305:SRBTAP>2.0.CO;2, 1994. 5. Berenguer, M., Surcel, M., Zawadzki, I., Xue, M., and Kong, F.: The Diurnal Cycle of Precipitation from Continental Radar Mosaics and Numerical Weather Prediction Models. Part II: Intercomparison among Numerical Models and with Nowcasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2689–2705, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00181.1, 2012.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|