Representation of the phosphorus cycle in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (vn5.5_JULES-CNP)
-
Published:2022-07-07
Issue:13
Volume:15
Page:5241-5269
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Nakhavali Mahdi AndréORCID, Mercado Lina M.ORCID, Hartley Iain P., Sitch Stephen, Cunha Fernanda V., di Ponzio Raffaello, Lugli Laynara F.ORCID, Quesada Carlos A., Andersen Kelly M., Chadburn Sarah E.ORCID, Wiltshire Andy J., Clark Douglas B.ORCID, Ribeiro Gyovanni, Siebert Lara, Moraes Anna C. M., Schmeisk Rosa Jéssica, Assis Rafael, Camargo José L.
Abstract
Abstract. Most land surface models (LSMs), i.e. the land components of Earth system models
(ESMs), include representation of nitrogen (N) limitation on ecosystem
productivity. However, only a few of these models have incorporated phosphorus
(P) cycling. In tropical ecosystems, this is likely to be important as N
tends to be abundant, whereas the availability of rock-derived elements, such as
P, can be very low. Thus, without a representation of P cycling, tropical
forest response in areas such as Amazonia to rising atmospheric CO2
conditions remain highly uncertain. In this study, we introduced P dynamics
and its interactions with the N and carbon (C) cycles into the Joint UK Land
Environment Simulator (JULES). The new model (JULES-CNP) includes the
representation of P stocks in vegetation and soil pools, as well as key
processes controlling fluxes between these pools. We develop and evaluate
JULES-CNP using in situ data collected at a low-fertility site in the
central Amazon, with a soil P content representative of 60 % of soils
across the Amazon basin, to parameterize, calibrate, and evaluate JULES-CNP.
Novel soil and plant P pool observations are used for parameterization and
calibration, and the model is evaluated against C fluxes and stocks and
those soil P pools not used for parameterization or calibration. We then
evaluate the model at additional P-limited test sites across the Amazon and in
Panama and Hawaii, showing a significant improvement over the C- and CN-only
versions of the model. The model is then applied under elevated
CO2 (600 ppm) at our study site in the central Amazon to quantify the impact
of P limitation on CO2 fertilization. We compare our results against the
current state-of-the-art CNP models using the same methodology that was used
in the AmazonFACE model intercomparison study. The model is able to
reproduce the observed plant and soil P pools and fluxes used for evaluation
under ambient CO2. We estimate P to limit net primary productivity
(NPP) by 24 % under current CO2 and by 46 % under elevated
CO2. Under elevated CO2, biomass in simulations accounting for CNP
increase by 10 % relative to contemporary CO2 conditions, although it
is 5 % lower compared to CN- and C-only simulations. Our results
highlight the potential for high P limitation and therefore lower CO2 fertilization capacity in the Amazon rainforest with low-fertility soils.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council Newton Fund
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference140 articles.
1. Aerts, R. and Chapin, F. S.: The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited:
A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns, Adv. Ecol. Res., 30, 1–67,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60016-1, 1999. 2. Anav, A., Friedlingstein, P., Kidston, M., Bopp, L., Ciais, P., Cox, P.,
Jones, C., Jung, M., Myneni, R., and Zhu, Z.: Evaluating the land and ocean
components of the global carbon cycle in the CMIP5 earth system models, J.
Climate, 26, 6801–6843, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00417.1, 2013. 3. Aragão, L. E. O. C., Malhi, Y., Metcalfe, D. B., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Jiménez, E., Navarrete, D., Almeida, S., Costa, A. C. L., Salinas, N., Phillips, O. L., Anderson, L. O., Alvarez, E., Baker, T. R., Goncalvez, P. H., Huamán-Ovalle, J., Mamani-Solórzano, M., Meir, P., Monteagudo, A., Patiño, S., Peñuela, M. C., Prieto, A., Quesada, C. A., Rozas-Dávila, A., Rudas, A., Silva Jr., J. A., and Vásquez, R.: Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils, Biogeosciences, 6, 2759–2778, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2759-2009, 2009. 4. Araújo, A. C., Nobre, A. D., Kruijt, B., Elbers, J. A., Dallarosa, R.,
Stefani, P., Randow, C. von, Manzi, A. O., Culf, A. D., Gash, J. H. C.,
Valentini, R., and Kabat, P.: Comparative measurements of carbon dioxide
fluxes from two nearby towers in a central Amazonian rainforest: The Manaus
LBA site, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8090, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000676,
2002. 5. Argles, A. P. K., Moore, J. R., Huntingford, C., Wiltshire, A. J., Harper, A. B., Jones, C. D., and Cox, P. M.: Robust Ecosystem Demography (RED version 1.0): a parsimonious approach to modelling vegetation dynamics in Earth system models, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4067–4089, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4067-2020, 2020.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|