Embedding a one-column ocean model in the Community Atmosphere Model 5.3 to improve Madden–Julian Oscillation simulation in boreal winter
-
Published:2022-07-22
Issue:14
Volume:15
Page:5689-5712
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Lan Yung-Yao, Hsu Huang-Hsiung, Tseng Wan-LingORCID, Jiang Li-Chiang
Abstract
Abstract. The effect of the air–sea interaction on the Madden–Julian Oscillation
(MJO) was investigated using the one-column ocean model
Snow–Ice–Thermocline (SIT 1.06) embedded in the Community Atmosphere Model
5.3 (CAM5.3; hereafter CAM5–SIT v1.0). The SIT model with 41 vertical
layers was developed to simulate sea surface temperature (SST) and
upper-ocean temperature variations with a high vertical resolution that
resolves the cool skin and diurnal warm layer and the upper oceanic
temperature gradient. A series of 30-year sensitivity experiments were
conducted in which various model configurations (e.g., coupled versus
uncoupled, vertical resolution and depth of the SIT model, coupling domains,
and absence of the diurnal cycle) were considered to evaluate the effect of
air–sea coupling on MJO simulation. Most of the CAM5–SIT experiments
exhibit higher fidelity than the CAM5-alone experiment in characterizing the
basic features of the MJO such as spatiotemporal variability and the
eastward propagation in boreal winter. The overall MJO simulation
performance of CAM5–SIT benefits from (1) better resolving the fine
vertical structure of upper-ocean temperature and therefore the air–sea
interaction that results in more realistic intraseasonal variability in both
SST and atmospheric circulation and (2) the adequate thickness of a
vertically gridded ocean layer. The sensitivity experiments demonstrate the
necessity of coupling the tropical eastern Pacific in addition to the
tropical Indian Ocean and the tropical western Pacific. Coupling is more
essential in the south than north of the Equator in the tropical western
Pacific. Enhanced MJO could be obtained without considering the diurnal
cycle in coupling.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference72 articles.
1. Adler, R. F., Huffman, G. J., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Xie, P. P., Janowiak, J., Rudolf, B., Schneider, U., Curtis, S., Bolvin, D., Gruber, A., Susskind, J., Arkin, P., and Nelkini, E.: The Version 2.1 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–Present), J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 1147–1167, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1147:TVGPCP>2.0.CO;2, 2003. 2. Ahn, M.-S., Kim, D., Sperber, K. R., Kang, I.-S., Maloney, E., Waliser, D., and Hendon, H.: MJO simulation in CMIP5 climate models: MJO skill metrics and process-oriented diagnosis, Clim. Dynam., 49, 4023–4045, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3558-4, 2017. 3. Ahn, M.-S., Kim, D., Kang, D., Lee, J., Sperber, K. R., Glecker, P. J., Jiang, X., Ham, Y.-G., and Kim, H.: MJO propagation across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 models better than CMIP5 models?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087250, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087250, 2020. 4. Alappattu, D. P., Wang, Q., Kalogiros, J., Guy, N., and Jorgensen, D. P.: Variability of upper ocean thermohaline structure during a MJO event from DYNAMO aircraft observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 1122–1140, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012137, 2017. 5. Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 arc-minute globe relief model: Procedures, data sources and analysis, NOAA Tech. Memo. NESDIS NGDC-24, NOAA, Silver Spring, MD, 19 pp., https://doi.org/10.7289/V5C8276M, 2009.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|