A zero-power warming chamber for investigating plant responses to rising temperature
-
Published:2017-09-19
Issue:18
Volume:14
Page:4071-4083
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Lewin Keith F., McMahon Andrew M., Ely Kim S., Serbin Shawn P.ORCID, Rogers AlistairORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Advances in understanding and model representation of plant and ecosystem responses to rising temperature have typically required temperature manipulation of research plots, particularly when considering warming scenarios that exceed current climate envelopes. In remote or logistically challenging locations, passive warming using solar radiation is often the only viable approach for temperature manipulation. However, current passive warming approaches are only able to elevate the mean daily air temperature by ∼ 1.5 °C. Motivated by our need to understand temperature acclimation in the Arctic, where warming has been markedly greater than the global average and where future warming is projected to be ∼ 2–3 °C by the middle of the century; we have developed an alternative approach to passive warming. Our zero-power warming (ZPW) chamber requires no electrical power for fully autonomous operation. It uses a novel system of internal and external heat exchangers that allow differential actuation of pistons in coupled cylinders to control chamber venting. This enables the ZPW chamber venting to respond to the difference between the external and internal air temperatures, thereby increasing the potential for warming and eliminating the risk of overheating. During the thaw season on the coastal tundra of northern Alaska our ZPW chamber was able to elevate the mean daily air temperature 2.6 °C above ambient, double the warming achieved by an adjacent passively warmed control chamber that lacked our hydraulic system. We describe the construction, evaluation and performance of our ZPW chamber and discuss the impact of potential artefacts associated with the design and its operation on the Arctic tundra. The approach we describe is highly flexible and tunable, enabling customization for use in many different environments where significantly greater temperature manipulation than that possible with existing passive warming approaches is desired.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference42 articles.
1. ACIA: Arctic Climatic Impact Assessment – Scientific Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, UK, 2005. 2. Amthor, J. S., Hanson, P. J., Norby, R. J., and Wullschleger, S. D.: A comment on “Appropriate experimental ecosystem warming methods by ecosystem, objective, and practicality” by Aronson and McNulty, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 497–498, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.020, 2010. 3. Aronson, E. L. and McNulty, S. G.: Appropriate experimental ecosystem warming methods by ecosystem, objective, and practicality, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 1791–1799, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.007, 2009. 4. Barton, C. V. M., Ellsworth, D. S., Medlyn, B. E., Duursma, R. A., Tissue, D. T., Adams, M. A., Eamus, D., Conroy, J. P., McMurtrie, R. E., Parsby, J., and Linder, S.: Whole-tree chambers for elevated atmospheric CO2 experimentation and tree scale flux measurements in south-eastern Australia: The Hawkesbury Forest Experiment, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 941–951, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.03.001, 2010. 5. Bockheim, J. G., Everett, L. R., Hinkel, K. M., Nelson, F. E., and Brown, J.: Soil organic carbon storage and distribution in Arctic Tundra, Barrow, Alaska, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 934–940, 1999.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|