Air quality and related health impact in the UNECE region: source attribution and scenario analysis
-
Published:2023-07-25
Issue:14
Volume:23
Page:8225-8240
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Belis Claudio A.ORCID, Van Dingenen RitaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The TM5-FAst Scenario Screening Tool (TM5-FASST) was used to study the influence of abatement policies within and outside the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) region on the exposure to O3 and PM2.5 and associated mortality in the UNECE countries. To that end, the impacts of pollutants derived from different geographic areas and activity sectors were evaluated using ECLIPSE V6b scenarios of air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction. The mortalities were attributed to O3 and PM2.5 following the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) approach and allocated to geographic areas (UNECE and non-UNECE) and activity sectors, including natural sources. In addition, a combination of runs designed
for the purpose led to allocating exposure to O3 and related mortality to two families of precursors: NOx–VOC and
CH4. In this study, the baseline scenario (current legislation scenario, CLE), which assumes that all air quality and greenhouse gas abatement measures adopted by 2018 are fully implemented, is compared with more ambitious scenarios (maximum feasible reduction, MFR). The findings from this comparison indicate that O3 exposure within the UNECE area is more sensitive to measures outside the UNECE region than PM2.5 exposure, even though the latter leads to higher mortality than the former. In the CLE, the mortality associated with O3 exposure in the UNECE region grows steadily from 2020 to 2050. The upward trend is mainly associated with the growing impact of CH4 emissions from areas outside UNECE. Also, the mortality related to NOx–VOC emissions outside UNECE increases in the same period. By comparison, a measurable decrease (13 %) is observed in the mortality attributable to NOx–VOC emissions within UNECE. In the same time window, the mortality associated with PM2.5 exposure in the UNECE region decreases between 2020 and 2040 and then rises until 2050. The PM2.5-related mortality in UNECE is mainly due to anthropogenic emissions within this region followed by natural sources (sea salt and dust) mainly located outside the UNECE region. Between 2020 and 2050, the impact of some UNECE anthropogenic sources on PM2.5-related mortality decreases progressively, in particular road transport, energy production and domestic combustion, while others, namely agriculture and industry, show an upward trend. Finally, the analysis of MFR scenarios confirms that abatement measures in line with UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Agreement can lead to significant co-benefits between air quality and climate policies.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference29 articles.
1. Akimoto, H. and Tanimoto, H.:
Rethinking of the adverse effects of NOx-control on the reduction of methane and tropospheric ozone – Challenges toward a denitrified society, Atmos. Environ., 277, 119033, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119033, 2022. 2. Amann, M., Bertok, I., Borken-Kleefeld, J., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Klimont, Z., Nguyen, B., Posch, M., Rafaj, P., Sandler, R., Schöpp, W., Wagner, F., and Winiwarter, W.:
Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1489–1501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.012, 2011. 3. Belis, C. A. and Van Dingenen, R.: Air quality source attribution and scenario analysis in the UNECE region (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8077436, 2023. 4. Belis, C. A., Pernigotti, D., Pirovano, G., Favez, O., Jaffrezo, J. L., Kuenen, J., Denier van Der Gon, H., Reizer, M., Riffault, V., Alleman, L. Y., Almeida, M., Amato, F., Angyal, A., Argyropoulos, G., Bande, S., Beslic, I., Besombes, J. L., Bove, M. C., Brotto, P., Calori, G., Cesari, D., Colombi, C., Contini, D., De Gennaro, G., Di Gilio, A., Diapouli, E., El Haddad, I., Elbern, H., Eleftheriadis, K., Ferreira, J., Vivanco, M. G., Gilardoni, S., Golly, B., Hellebust, S., Hopke, P. K., Izadmanesh, Y., Jorquera, H., Krajsek, K., Kranenburg, R., Lazzeri, P., Lenartz, F., Lucarelli, F., Maciejewska, K., Manders, A., Manousakas, M., Masiol, M., Mircea, M., Mooibroek, D., Nava, S., Oliveira, D., Paglione, M., Pandolfi, M., Perrone, M., Petralia, E., Pietrodangelo, A., Pillon, S., Pokorna, P., Prati, P., Salameh, D., Samara, C., Samek, L., Saraga, D., Sauvage, S., Schaap, M., Scotto, F., Sega, K., Siour, G., Tauler, R., Valli, G., Vecchi, R., Venturini, E., Vestenius, M., Waked, A., and Yubero, E.: Evaluation of receptor and chemical transport models for PM10 source apportionment, Atmospheric Environment X, 5, 100053, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100053, 2020. 5. Belis, C. A., Pirovano, G., Villani, M. G., Calori, G., Pepe, N., and Putaud, J. P.:
Comparison of source apportionment approaches and analysis of non-linearity in a real case model application, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4731–4750, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4731-2021, 2021.
|
|