Comparison of different methods for the in situ measurement of forest litter moisture content
-
Published:2016-02-09
Issue:2
Volume:16
Page:403-415
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Schunk C., Ruth B., Leuchner M.ORCID, Wastl C., Menzel A.
Abstract
Abstract. Dead fine fuel (e.g., litter) moisture content is an important parameter for both forest fire and ecological applications as it is related to ignitability, fire behavior and soil respiration. Real-time availability of this value would thus be a great benefit to fire risk management and prevention. However, the comprehensive literature review in this paper shows that there is no easy-to-use method for automated measurements available. This study investigates the applicability of four different sensor types (permittivity and electrical resistance measuring principles) for this measurement. Comparisons were made to manual gravimetric reference measurements carried out almost daily for one fire season and overall agreement was good (highly significant correlations with 0.792 < = r < = 0.947, p < 0.001). Standard deviations within sensor types were linearly correlated to daily sensor mean values; however, above a certain threshold they became irregular, which may be linked to exceedance of the working ranges. Thus, measurements with irregular standard deviations were considered unusable and relationships between gravimetric and automatic measurements of all individual sensors were compared only for useable periods. A large drift in these relationships became obvious from drought to drought period. This drift may be related to installation effects or settling and decomposition of the litter layer throughout the fire season. Because of the drift and the in situ calibration necessary, it cannot be recommended to use the methods presented here for monitoring purposes and thus operational hazard management. However, they may be interesting for scientific studies when some manual fuel moisture measurements are made anyway. Additionally, a number of potential methodological improvements are suggested.
Funder
Seventh Framework Programme
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference39 articles.
1. Aguado, I., Chuvieco, E., Boren, R., and Nieto, H.: Estimation of dead fuel
moisture content from meteorological data in Mediterranean areas,
Applications in fire danger assessment, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 16, 390–397,
https://doi.org/10.1071/WF06136, 2007. 2. Beall, H. W.: The duff hygrometer as an aid to fire weather research,
Forest. Chron., 4, 20–22, https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc4020-3, 1928. 3. Beck, J. A. and Armitage, O. B.: Diurnal fine fuel moisture and FFMC
characteristics at northern latitudes, in: Proceedings of the 22nd Tall
Timbers Fire Ecology Conference: Fire in Temperate, Boreal, and Montane
Ecosystems, Tallahassee, FL, 211–221, 2001. 4. Blonquist Jr., J. M., Jones, S. B., and Robinson, E. A.: A time domain
transmission sensor with TDR performance characteristics, J. Hydrol. 314,
235–245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.005, 2005. 5. Borken, W., Davidson, E. A., Savage, K., Gaudinski, J., and Trumbore, S. E.:
Drying and wetting effects on carbon dioxide release from organic horizons,
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, 1888–1896, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1888, 2003.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|