Comparison of different cross-sectional approaches for the structural design and optimization of composite wind turbine blades based on beam models
-
Published:2024-07-08
Issue:7
Volume:9
Page:1465-1481
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Werthen EdgarORCID, Hardt Daniel, Balzani ClaudioORCID, Hühne Christian
Abstract
Abstract. During the preliminary design phase of wind turbine blades, the evaluation of many design candidates in a short period of time plays an important role. Computationally efficient methods for the structural analysis that correctly predict stiffness matrix entries for beam models including the (bend–twist) coupling terms are thus needed. The present paper provides an extended overview of available approaches and shows their abilities to fulfill the requirements for the composite design of rotor blades with respect to accuracy and computational efficiency. Three cross-sectional theories are selected and implemented to compare the prediction quality of the cross-sectional coupling stiffness terms and the stress distribution based on different multi-cell test cross-sections. The cross-sectional results are compared with the 2D finite element code BECAS and are discussed in the context of accuracy and computational efficiency. The analytical solution performing best shows very small deviations in the stiffness matrix entries compared to BECAS (below 1 % in the majority of test cases). It achieved a better resolution of the stress distribution and a computation time that is more than an order of magnitude smaller using the same spatial discretization. The deviations of the stress distributions are below 10 % for most test cases. The analytical solution can thus be rated as a feasible approach for a beam-based pre-design of wind turbine rotor blades.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference45 articles.
1. Behnel, S., Bradshaw, R., Citro, C., Dalcin, L., Seljebotn, D. S., and Smith, K.: Cython: The best of both worlds, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 31–39, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2010.118, 2011. a 2. Bir, G. S.: User's Guide to PreComp (Pre-Processor for Computing Composite Blade Properties), National Renewable Energy Laboratory, https://doi.org/10.2172/876556, 2006. a 3. Blasques, J.: User's Manual for BECAS: A cross section analysis tool for anisotropic and inhomogeneous beam sections of arbitrary geometry, no. 1785(EN) in Denmark, Forskningscenter Risoe, Risoe-R, Risø DTU – National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/9a623506-af47-41d6-9d24-5ef0e5b762c1 (last access: 30 March 2024), 2012. a, b, c, d, e, f 4. Borri, M., Ghiringhelli, G. L., and Merlini, T.: Composite Beam Analysis Linear Analysis of Naturally Curved and Twisted Anisotropic Beams, United States Army, European Research Office of the US army, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a252652.pdf (last access: 30 March 2024), 1992. a 5. Bottasso, C., Campagnolo, F., Croce, A., and Tibaldi, C.: Optimization-based study of bend-twist coupled rotor blades for passive and integrated passive/active load alleviation, Wind Energy, 16, 1149–1166, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1543, 2012. a
|
|