Added value of geophysics-based soil mapping in agro-ecosystem simulations
Author:
Brogi CosimoORCID, Huisman Johan A.ORCID, Weihermüller LutzORCID, Herbst MichaelORCID, Vereecken HarryORCID
Abstract
Abstract. There is an increased demand for quantitative
high-resolution soil maps that enable within-field management. Commonly
available soil maps are generally not suited for this purpose, but digital
soil mapping and geophysical methods in particular allow soil
information to be obtained with an unprecedented level of detail. However, it is often
difficult to quantify the added value of such high-resolution soil
information for agricultural management and agro-ecosystem modelling. In
this study, a detailed geophysics-based soil map was compared to two
commonly available general-purpose soil maps. In particular, the three maps
were used as input for crop growth models to simulate leaf area index (LAI)
of five crops for an area of ∼ 1 km2. The simulated
development of LAI for the five crops was evaluated using LAI obtained from
multispectral satellite images. Overall, it was found that the
geophysics-based soil map provided better LAI predictions than the two
general-purpose soil maps in terms of correlation coefficient R2, model
efficiency (ME), and root mean square error (RMSE). Improved performance was
most apparent in the case of prolonged periods of drought and was strongly
related to the combination of soil characteristics and crop type.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference93 articles.
1. Ali, M., Montzka, C., Stadler, A., Menz, G., Thonfeld, F., and Vereecken,
H.: Estimation and validation of RapidEye-based time-series of leaf area
index for winter wheat in the Rur catchment (Germany), Remote Sens.-Basel, 7,
2808–2831, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70302808, 2015. 2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: FAO Irrigation and
drainage paper 56 – Crop evapotranspiration, Guidelines for computing crop
water requirements, FAO, Rome, Italy, 300, D05109, available at: http://www.fao.org/3/X0490E/X0490E00.htm (last access: 13 May 2021), 1998. 3. Antle, J. M., Basso, B., Conant, R. T., Godfray, H. C. J., Jones, J. W.,
Herrero, M., Howitt, R. E., Keating, B. A., Munoz-Carpena, R., and
Rosenzweig, C.: Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models
and knowledge products: Design and improvement, Agr. Syst., 155,
255–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.002, 2017. 4. Baker, F. G.: Variability of hydraulic conductivity within and between nine
Wisconsin soil series, Water Resour. Res., 14, 103–108, 1978. 5. Beck, P. S., Atzberger, C., Høgda, K. A., Johansen, B., and Skidmore, A.
K.: Improved monitoring of vegetation dynamics at very high latitudes: A new
method using MODIS NDVI, Remote Sens. Environ., 100, 321–334, 2006.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|