A model for rapid PM2.5 exposure estimates in wildfire conditions using routinely available data: rapidfire v0.1.3
-
Published:2024-01-16
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:381-397
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Raffuse SeanORCID, O'Neill SusanORCID, Schmidt Rebecca
Abstract
Abstract. Urban smoke exposure events from large wildfires have become increasingly common in California and throughout the western United States. The ability to study the impacts of high smoke aerosol exposures from these events on the public is limited by the availability of high-quality, spatially resolved estimates of aerosol concentrations. Methods for assigning aerosol exposure often employ multiple data sets that are time-consuming to create and difficult to reproduce. As these events have gone from occasional to nearly annual in frequency, the need for rapid smoke exposure assessments has increased. The rapidfire (relatively accurate particulate information derived from inputs retrieved easily) R package (version 0.1.3) provides a suite of tools for developing exposure assignments using data sets that are routinely generated and publicly available within a month of the event. Specifically, rapidfire harvests official air quality monitoring, satellite observations, meteorological modeling, operational predictive smoke modeling, and low-cost sensor networks. A machine learning approach, random forest (RF) regression, is used to fuse the different data sets. Using rapidfire, we produced estimates of ground-level 24 h average particulate matter for several large wildfire smoke events in California from 2017–2021. These estimates show excellent agreement with independent measures from filter-based networks.
Funder
University of California, Davis
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference69 articles.
1. Abdo, M., Ward, I., O'Dell, K., Ford, B., Pierce, J. R., Fischer, E. V., and Crooks, J. L.: Impact of wildfire smoke on adverse pregnancy outcomes in Colorado, 2007–2015, Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He., 16, 3720, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193720, 2019. a 2. Aguilera, R., Corringham, T., Gershunov, A., and Benmarhnia, T.: Wildfire smoke impacts respiratory health more than fine particles from other sources: observational evidence from Southern California, Nat. Commun., 12, 1493, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21708-0, 2021a. a 3. Aguilera, R., Corringham, T., Gershunov, A., Leibel, S., and Benmarhnia, T.: Fine particles in wildfire smoke and pediatric respiratory health in California, Pediatrics, 147, e2020027128, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-027128, 2021b. a 4. Al-Hamdan, M. Z., Crosson, W. L., Economou, S. A., Jr, M. G. E., Estes, S. M., Hemmings, S. N., Kent, S. T., Puckett, M., Quattrochi, D. A., Rickman, D. L., Wade, G. M., and McClure, L. A.: Environmental public health applications using remotely sensed data, Geocarto International, 29, 85–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2012.715209, 2014. a 5. Barkjohn, K. K., Gantt, B., and Clements, A. L.: Development and application of a United States-wide correction for PM2.5 data collected with the PurpleAir sensor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 4617–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4617-2021, 2021. a
|
|