Identifying atmospheric rivers and their poleward latent heat transport with generalizable neural networks: ARCNNv1
-
Published:2024-05-02
Issue:8
Volume:17
Page:3533-3557
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Mahesh Ankur, O'Brien Travis A.ORCID, Loring Burlen, Elbashandy Abdelrahman, Boos William, Collins William D.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are extreme weather events that can alleviate drought or cause billions of US dollars in flood damage. By transporting significant amounts of latent energy towards the poles, they are crucial to maintaining the climate system's energy balance. Since there is no first-principle definition of an AR grounded in geophysical fluid mechanics, AR identification is currently performed by a multitude of expert-defined, threshold-based algorithms. The variety of AR detection algorithms has introduced uncertainty into the study of ARs, and the thresholds of the algorithms may not generalize to new climate datasets and resolutions. We train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to detect ARs while representing this uncertainty; we name these models ARCNNs. To detect ARs without requiring new labeled data and labor-intensive AR detection campaigns, we present a semi-supervised learning framework based on image style transfer. This framework generalizes ARCNNs across climate datasets and input fields. Using idealized and realistic numerical models, together with observations, we assess the performance of the ARCNNs. We test the ARCNNs in an idealized simulation of a shallow-water fluid in which nearly all the tracer transport can be attributed to AR-like filamentary structures. In reanalysis and a high-resolution climate model, we use ARCNNs to calculate the contribution of ARs to meridional latent heat transport, and we demonstrate that this quantity varies considerably due to AR detection uncertainty.
Funder
Biological and Environmental Research
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference118 articles.
1. Aitken, A., Ledig, C., Theis, L., Caballero, J., Wang, Z., and Shi, W.: Checkerboard artifact free sub-pixel convolution: A note on sub-pixel convolution, resize convolution and convolution resize, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1707.02937, 2017. a 2. Atapour-Abarghouei, A. and Breckon, T. P.: Real-Time Monocular Depth Estimation Using Synthetic Data with Domain Adaptation via Image Style Transfer, in: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2800-2810, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2018.00296, 2018. a 3. Beucler, T., Pritchard, M., Gentine, P., and Rasp, S.: Towards Physically-Consistent, Data-Driven Models of Convection, in: IGARSS 2020 – 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 3987–3990, https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss39084.2020.9324569, 2020. a 4. Beucler, T., Pritchard, M., Yuval, J., Gupta, A., Peng, L., Rasp, S., Ahmed, F., O'Gorman, P. A., Neelin, J. D., Lutsko, N. J., and Gentine, P.: Climate-Invariant Machine Learning, arxiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2112.08440, 2021. a, b 5. Bourdin, S., Fromang, S., Dulac, W., Cattiaux, J., and Chauvin, F.: Intercomparison of four algorithms for detecting tropical cyclones using ERA5, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6759–6786, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6759-2022, 2022. a
|
|