Metrological assessment of a robotic total station for use in post-earthquake emergency conditions
-
Published:2023-06-15
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:187-195
-
ISSN:2194-878X
-
Container-title:Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J. Sens. Sens. Syst.
Author:
D'Emilia GiulioORCID, Natale EmanuelaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The paper provides synthetic indications regarding the measuring performances of procedures for using a robotic total station (RTS) in emergency situations, such as the survey of the structural conditions of buildings and the assessment of the safety level for rescue operations after the occurrence of an earthquake. Particular attention is paid to operative aspects that could impact on the performance of the system in this situation; specifically considered is the effect of the layout of the measurement setup and of the number of monitoring points, depending on the geometry of the site and of the considered buildings, because the criticality of emergency conditions imposes geometrical solutions which are far from having optimal solutions. The analysis is carried out with reference to two different buildings, which have different characteristics from the point of view of height and distance from the instrument, and that implies different geometrical constraints for the instrument during the acquisition of the monitoring
points. The methodology allows the evaluation of the repeatability, reproducibility, and detection limit of a RTS, in field conditions, referring to a 1-year observation period, with reference to different quantities, like positions of the monitoring points and the inclination of walls and façades. In particular, the analysis of the geometrical characteristics of reduced configurations of the monitoring points has highlighted interesting aspects in view of defining a simplified procedure, which is also suitable for speeding up the acquisition of reliable data in emergency conditions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Instrumentation
Reference22 articles.
1. Alicandro, M., D'Emilia, G., Dominici, D., Gaspari, A., Marsella, S., Marzoli, M.,
Natale, E., and Zollini, S.: Validation of a measurement procedure for the
assessment of the safety of buildings in urgent technical rescue operations,
ACTA IMEKO, 10, 140–146, https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v10i4.1141,
2021. 2. Berezowski, V., Mallet, X., and Moffat, I.: Geomatic techniques in forensic
science: A review, Sci. Justice, 60, 99–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.10.006, 2020. 3. Beshr, A. A. A. and Abo Elnaga, B. M.: Investigating the accuracy of digital
levels and reflectorless total stations for purposes of geodetic
engineering, Alex. Eng. J., 50, 399–405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2011.12.004,
2011. 4. D'Emilia, G., Gaspari, A., Mazzoleni, F., Natale, E., and Schiavi, A.: Calibration of tri-axial MEMS accelerometers in the low-frequency range – Part 2: Uncertainty assessment, J. Sens. Sens. Syst., 7, 403–410, https://doi.org/10.5194/jsss-7-403-2018, 2018. 5. Franzini, M., Casella, V., Marchese, P., Marini, M., Della Porta, G., and Felletti, F.: VALIDATION OF A UAV-DERIVED POINT CLOUD BY SEMANTIC CLASSIFICATION AND COMPARISON WITH TLS DATA, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 83–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-83-2021, 2021.
|
|