Refining data–data and data–model vegetation comparisons using the Earth mover's distance (EMD)
-
Published:2023-05-30
Issue:5
Volume:19
Page:1043-1060
-
ISSN:1814-9332
-
Container-title:Climate of the Past
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Clim. Past
Author:
Chevalier ManuelORCID, Dallmeyer AnneORCID, Weitzel NilsORCID, Li ChenzhiORCID, Baudouin Jean-Philippe, Herzschuh Ulrike, Cao XianyongORCID, Hense AndreasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Comparing temporal and spatial vegetation changes between reconstructions or between reconstructions and model simulations requires carefully selecting an appropriate evaluation metric. A common way of comparing reconstructed and simulated vegetation changes involves measuring the agreement between pollen- or model-derived unary vegetation estimates, such as the biome or plant functional type (PFT) with the highest affinity scores. While this approach based on summarising the vegetation signal into
unary vegetation estimates performs well in general, it overlooks the
details of the underlying vegetation structure. However, this underlying
data structure can influence conclusions since minor variations in pollen
percentages modify which biome or PFT has the highest affinity score (i.e. modify the unary vegetation estimate). To overcome this limitation, we propose using the Earth mover's distance (EMD) to quantify the mismatch between vegetation distributions such as biome or PFT affinity scores. The EMD circumvents the issue of summarising the data into unary biome or PFT estimates by considering the entire range of biome or PFT affinity scores to calculate a distance between the compared entities. In addition, each type of mismatch can be given a specific weight to account for case-specific ecological distances or, said differently, to account for the fact that reconstructing a temperate forest instead of a boreal forest is ecologically more coherent than reconstructing a temperate forest instead of a desert. We also introduce two EMD-based statistical tests that determine (1) if the similarity of two samples is significantly better than a random association given a particular context and (2) if the pairing between two datasets is better than might be expected by chance. To illustrate the potential and the advantages of the EMD as well as the tests in vegetation comparison studies, we reproduce different case studies based on previously published simulated and reconstructed biome changes for Europe and capitalise on the advantages of the EMD to refine the interpretations of past vegetation changes by highlighting that flickering unary estimates, which give an impression of high vegetation instability, can correspond to gradual vegetation changes with low EMD values between contiguous samples (case study 1). We also reproduce data–model comparisons for five specific time slices to identify those that are statistically more robust than a random agreement while accounting for the underlying vegetation structure of each pollen sample (case study 2). The EMD and the statistical tests are included in the paleotools R package (https://github.com/mchevalier2/paleotools, last access: 3 May 2023).
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung H2020 European Research Council China Scholarship Council Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Paleontology,Stratigraphy,Global and Planetary Change
Reference49 articles.
1. Allen, J. R. M., Hickler, T., Singarayer, J. S., Sykes, M. T., Valdes, P. J., and Huntley, B.: Last glacial vegetation of northern Eurasia, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 29, 2604–2618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.05.031, 2010. 2. Allen, J. R. M., Forrest, M., Hickler, T., Singarayer, J. S., Valdes, P. J.,
and Huntley, B.: Global vegetation patterns of the past 140,000 years, J.
Biogeogr., 47, 2073–2090, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13930, 2020. 3. Altman, D. G.: Practical statistics for medical research, CRC Press, ISBN 0412276305, 1990. 4. Bigelow, N. H., Brubaker, L. B., Edwards, M. E., Harrison, S. P., Prentice, I. C., Anderson, P. M., Andreev, A. A., Bartlein, P. J., Christensen, T. R.,
Cramer, W., Kaplan, J. O., Lozhkin, A. V., Matveyeva, N. V., Murray, D. F.,
McGuire, A. D., Razzhivin, V. Y., Ritchie, J. C., Smith, B., Walker, D. A.,
Gajewski, K., Wolf, V., Holmqvist, B. H., Igarashi, Y., Kremenetskii, K.,
Paus, A., Pisaric, M. F. J., and Volkova, V. S.: Climate change and Arctic
ecosystems: 1. Vegetation changes north of 55∘ N between the last
glacial maximum, mid-Holocene, and present, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, D19, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002558, 2003. 5. Binney, H. A., Willis, K. J., Edwards, M. E., Bhagwat, S. A., Anderson, P.
M., Andreev, A. A., Blaauw, M., Damblon, F., Haesaerts, P., Kienast, F.,
Kremenetski, K. V., Krivonogov, S. K., Lozhkin, A. V., MacDonald, G. M., Novenko, E. Y., Oksanen, P., Sapelko, T. V., Väliranta, M., and Vazhenina, L.: The distribution of late-Quaternary woody taxa in northern Eurasia: evidence from a new macrofossil database, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 28, 2445–2464, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.016, 2009.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|