Astronomical calibration of the geological timescale: closing the middle Eocene gap
Author:
Westerhold T.ORCID, Röhl U.ORCID, Frederichs T.ORCID, Bohaty S. M., Zachos J. C.
Abstract
Abstract. To explore cause and consequences in past climate reconstructions highly accuracy age models are inevitable. The highly accurate astronomical calibration of the geological time scale beyond 40 million years critically depends on the accuracy of orbital models and radio-isotopic dating techniques. Discrepancies in the age dating of sedimentary successions and the lack of suitable records spanning the middle Eocene have prevented development of a continuous astronomically calibrated geological timescale for the entire Cenozoic Era. We now solve this problem by constructing an independent astrochronological stratigraphy based on Earth's stable 405 kyr eccentricity cycle between 41 and 48 million years ago (Ma) with new data from deep-sea sedimentary sequences in the South Atlantic Ocean. This new link completes the Paleogene astronomical time scale and confirms the intercalibration of radio-isotopic and astronomical dating methods back through the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, 55.930 Ma) and the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary (66.022 Ma). Coupling of the Paleogene 405 kyr cyclostratigraphic frameworks across the middle Eocene further paves the way for extending the Astronomical Time Scale (ATS) into the Mesozoic.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference55 articles.
1. Aubry, M. P.: From Chronology to Stratigraphy: Interpreting the Lower and Middle Eocene Stratigraphic Record in the Atlantic Ocean, in: Geochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation, edited by: Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M. P., and Hardenbol, J., SEPM, Spec. Publ., 213–274, https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.95.04.0213, 1995. 2. Cande, S. C. and Kent, D. V.: Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late cretaceous and cenozoic, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 6093–6095, 1995. 3. Channell, J. E. T., Hodell, D. A., Singer, B. S., and Xuan, C.: Reconciling astrochronological and 40Ar/39Ar ages for the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary and late Matuyama Chron, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 11, 21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003203, 2010. 4. Charles, A. J., Condon, D. J., Harding, I. C., Pälike, H., Marshall, J. E. A., Cui, Y., Kump, L., and Croudace, I. W.: Constraints on the numerical age of the Paleocene-Eocene boundary, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 12, Q0AA17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gc003426, 2011. 5. Clement, B. M. and Hailwood, E. A.: Magnetostratigraphy of sediments from Sites 701 and 702, in: Proc. ODP, Sci. Results, 114, College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), edited by: Ciesielski, P. F., Kristoffersen, Y., and et al., College Station, TX Ocean Drilling Program, Texas A&M University, 359–366, https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.114.156.1991, 1991.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|