Evaluation of a low-cost optical particle counter (Alphasense OPC-N2) for ambient air monitoring
-
Published:2018-02-07
Issue:2
Volume:11
Page:709-720
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Crilley Leigh R.ORCID, Shaw Marvin, Pound RyanORCID, Kramer Louisa J., Price Robin, Young Stuart, Lewis Alastair C., Pope Francis D.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. A fast-growing area of research is the development of low-cost sensors for
measuring air pollutants. The affordability and size of low-cost particle
sensors makes them an attractive option for use in experiments requiring a
number of instruments such as high-density spatial mapping. However, for
these low-cost sensors to be useful for these types of studies their accuracy
and precision need to be quantified. We evaluated the Alphasense OPC-N2, a
promising low-cost miniature optical particle counter, for monitoring ambient
airborne particles at typical urban background sites in the UK. The precision
of the OPC-N2 was assessed by co-locating 14 instruments at a site to
investigate the variation in measured concentrations. Comparison to two
different reference optical particle counters as well as a TEOM-FDMS enabled
the accuracy of the OPC-N2 to be evaluated. Comparison of the OPC-N2 to the
reference optical instruments shows some limitations for measuring mass
concentrations of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10. The OPC-N2 demonstrated
a significant positive artefact in measured particle mass during times of
high ambient RH (> 85 %) and a calibration factor was
developed based upon κ-Köhler theory, using average bulk particle
aerosol hygroscopicity. Application of this RH correction factor resulted in
the OPC-N2 measurements being within 33 % of the TEOM-FDMS, comparable to
the agreement between a reference optical particle counter and the TEOM-FDMS
(20 %). Inter-unit precision for the 14 OPC-N2 sensors of
22 ± 13 % for PM10 mass concentrations was observed. Overall,
the OPC-N2 was found to accurately measure ambient airborne particle mass
concentration provided they are (i) correctly calibrated and (ii) corrected
for ambient RH. The level of precision demonstrated between multiple
OPC-N2s suggests that they would be
suitable devices for applications
where the spatial variability in particle concentration was to be determined.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference29 articles.
1. Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions.
Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89,
13–41, 2008. 2. Borrego, C., Costa, A. M., Ginja, J., Amorim, M., Coutinho, M., Karatzas, K.,
Sioumis, T., Katsifarakis, N., Konstantinidis, K., De Vito, S., Esposito, E.,
Smith, P., André, N., Gérard, P., Francis, L. A., Castell, N.,
Schneider, P., Viana, M., Minguillón, M. C., Reimringer, W., Otjes, R.
P., von Sicard, O., Pohle, R., Elen, B., Suriano, D., Pfister, V., Prato, M.,
Dipinto, S., and Penza, M.: Assessment of air quality microsensors versus
reference methods: The EuNetAir joint exercise, Atmos. Environ., 147,
246–263, 2016. 3. Castellini, S., Moroni, B., and Cappelletti, D.: PMetro: Measurement of urban
aerosols on a mobile platform, Measurement, 49, 99–106, 2014. 4. Charron, A., Harrison, R. M., Moorcroft, S., and Booker, J.: Quantitative
interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass
measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments, Atmos. Environ.,
38, 415–423, 2004. 5. de Nazelle, A., Bode, O., and Orjuela, J. P.: Comparison of air pollution
exposures in active vs. passive travel modes in European cities: A
quantitative review, Environ. Int., 99, 151–160, 2017.
Cited by
278 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|