Technical note: Influence of surface roughness and local turbulence on coated-wall flow tube experiments for gas uptake and kinetic studies
-
Published:2018-02-23
Issue:4
Volume:18
Page:2669-2686
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Li GuoORCID, Su HangORCID, Kuhn Uwe, Meusel HannahORCID, Ammann MarkusORCID, Shao Min, Pöschl UlrichORCID, Cheng YafangORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Coated-wall flow tube reactors are frequently used to investigate gas uptake and heterogeneous or multiphase reaction kinetics under laminar flow conditions. Coating surface roughness may potentially distort the laminar flow pattern, induce turbulence and introduce uncertainties in the calculated uptake coefficient based on molecular diffusion assumptions (e.g., Brown/Cooney–Kim–Davis (CKD)/Knopf–Pöschl–Shiraiwa (KPS) methods), which has not been fully resolved in earlier studies. Here, we investigate the influence of surface roughness and local turbulence on coated-wall flow tube experiments for gas uptake and kinetic studies. According to laminar boundary theory and considering the specific flow conditions in a coated-wall flow tube, we derive and propose a critical height δc to evaluate turbulence effects in the design and analysis of coated-wall flow tube experiments. If a geometric coating thickness δg is larger than δc, the roughness elements of the coating may cause local turbulence and result in overestimation of the real uptake coefficient (γ). We further develop modified CKD/KPS methods (i.e., CKD-LT/KPS-LT) to account for roughness-induced local turbulence effects. By combination of the original methods and their modified versions, the maximum error range of γCKD (derived with the CKD method) or γKPS (derived with the KPS method) can be quantified and finally γ can be constrained. When turbulence is generated, γCKD or γKPS can bear large difference compared to γ. Their difference becomes smaller for gas reactants with lower uptake (i.e., smaller γ) and/or for a smaller ratio of the geometric coating thickness to the flow tube radius (δg ∕ R0). On the other hand, the critical height δc can also be adjusted by optimizing flow tube configurations and operating conditions (i.e., tube diameter, length, and flow velocity), to ensure not only unaffected laminar flow patterns but also other specific requirements for an individual flow tube experiment. We use coating thickness values from previous coated-wall flow tube studies to assess potential roughness effects using the δc criterion. In most studies, the coating thickness was sufficiently small to avoid complications, but some may have been influenced by surface roughness and local turbulence effects.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Achdou, Y., Pironneau, O., and Valentin, F.: Effective Boundary Conditions for Laminar Flows over Periodic Rough Boundaries, J. Comput. Phys., 147, 187–218, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.6088, 1998. 2. Bartels-Rausch, T., Huthwelker, T., Gaggeler, H. W., and Ammann, M.: Atmospheric pressure coated-wall flow-tube study of acetone adsorption on ice, J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 4531–4539, 2005. 3. Bedjanian, Y., Romanias, M. N., and El Zein, A.: Interaction of OH Radicals with Arizona Test Dust: Uptake and Products, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 393–400, 2013. 4. Brown, R. L.: Tubular Flow Reactors With First-Order Kinetics, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 83, 1–8, 1978. 5. Chu, L. T., Diao, G. W., and Chu, L.: Kinetics of HOBr uptake on NaBr and NaCl surfaces at varying relative humidity, J. Phys. Chem. B, 106, 5679–5688, 2002.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|