Assessing the ecological value of dynamic mountain geomorphosites
-
Published:2021-10-04
Issue:4
Volume:76
Page:385-399
-
ISSN:2194-8798
-
Container-title:Geographica Helvetica
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geogr. Helv.
Author:
Bussard JonathanORCID, Giaccone Elisa
Abstract
Abstract. Geoheritage is a component of geodiversity constituted by all the elements
of geodiversity recognized by society for their particular values. The
definition of these values, including the importance of geoheritage for
biodiversity, plays a key role in the process of heritage recognition and
geoconservation policymaking. In mountain environments, dynamic geomorphosites have a strong influence on plant diversity because the active geomorphological processes responsible for their formation act as renovators for habitats of pioneer species. In this paper, we propose criteria to assess the ecological value of dynamic mountain geomorphosites. We show that the interest of plant communities (species richness and presence of rare or protected species) and the influence of geomorphological processes on plant communities (disturbances, surface movement and soil) are fundamental criteria for assessing the ecological value in an exhaustive and objective way and that the question of the scale (local and national scales) is also a crucial parameter. We then illustrate this methodological proposal by evaluating the ecological value of three dynamic geomorphosites and a talus slope in the western Swiss Alps.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Anthropology,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change
Reference117 articles.
1. Anderson, M. G. and Ferree, C. E.: Conserving the Stage: Climate Change and
the Geophysical Underpinnings of Species Diversity, PLOS One, 5, e11554,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011554, 2010. 2. Atkinson, C. L., Allen, D. C., Davis, L., and Nickerson, Z. L.: Incorporating
ecogeomorphic feedbacks to better understand resiliency in streams: A review
and directions forward, Geomorphology, 305, 123–140,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.07.016, 2018. 3. Beier, P. and Brost, B.: Use of Land Facets to Plan for Climate Change:
Conserving the Arenas, Not the Actors, Conserv. Biol., 24, 701–710,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01422.x, 2010. 4. Beniston, M., Farinotti, D., Stoffel, M., Andreassen, L. M., Coppola, E.,
Eckert, N., Fantini, A., Giacona, F., Hauck, C., Huss, M., Huwald, H.,
Lehning, M., López-Moreno, J.-I., Magnusson, J., Marty, C.,
Morán-Tejéda, E., Morin, S., Naaim, M., Provenzale, A., Rabatel, A.,
Six, D., Stötter, J., Strasser, U., Terzago, S., and Vincent, C.: The
European mountain cryosphere: a review of its current state, trends, and
future challenges, The Cryosphere, 12, 759–794,
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-759-2018, 2018. 5. Bétard, F.: Géodiversité, biodiversité et patrimoines
environnementaux. De la connaissance à la conservation et à la
valorisation, Mémoire d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches,
Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, 2017.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|