Rethinking the deployment of static chambers for CO2 flux measurement in dry desert soils
-
Published:2023-09-19
Issue:18
Volume:20
Page:3791-3802
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Bekin Nadav, Agam NuritORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The mechanisms underlying the soil CO2 flux (Fs) in dry
desert soils are not fully understood. To better understand these processes,
we must accurately estimate these small fluxes. The most commonly used
method, static chambers, inherently alters the conditions that affect the
flux and may introduce errors of the same order of magnitude as the flux
itself. Regional and global assessments of annual soil respiration rates are
based on extrapolating point measurements conducted with flux chambers. Yet,
studies conducted in desert ecosystems rarely discuss potential errors
associated with using static chambers in dry and bare soils. We hypothesized
that a main source of error is the collar protrusion above the soil surface.
During the 2021 dry season, we deployed four automated chambers on collars
with different configurations in the Negev, Israel. Fs exhibited a
repetitive diel cycle of nocturnal uptake and daytime efflux. CO2 uptake
measured over the conventionally protruding collars was significantly lower
than over the collars flushed with the soil surface. Using thermal imaging,
we proved that the protruding collar walls distorted the ambient heating and
cooling regime of the topsoil layer, increasing the mean surface
temperatures. Higher soil temperatures during the night suppressed the flux
driving forces, i.e., soil–atmosphere CO2 and temperature gradients,
ultimately leading to an underestimation of up to 50 % of the actual Fs.
Accordingly, the total daily CO2 uptake by the soil in the conventionally
deployed collars was underestimated by 35 %. This suggests that desert
soils are a larger carbon sink than previously reported and that drylands,
which cover approximately 40 % of Earth's terrestrial surface, may play a
significant role in the global carbon balance.
Funder
Israel Science Foundation
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference39 articles.
1. Austin, A. T., Yahdjian, L., Stark, J. M., Belnap, J., Porporato, A.,
Norton, U., Ravetta, D. A., and Schaeffer, S. M.: Water pulses and
biogeochemical cycles in arid and semiarid ecosystems, Oecologia, 141,
221–235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1519-1, 2004. 2. Bain, W. G., Hutyra, L., Patterson, D. C., Bright, A. V., Daube, B. C.,
Munger, J. W., and Wofsy, S. C.: Wind-induced error in the measurement of
soil respiration using closed dynamic chambers, Agric. For. Meteorol., 131,
225–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.06.004, 2005. 3. Ball, B. A., Virginia, R. A., Barrett, J. E., Parsons, A. N., and Wall, D.
H.: Interactions between physical and biotic factors influence CO2 flux in
Antarctic dry valley soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 41, 1510–1517,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.011, 2009. 4. Baram, S., Bar-Tal, A., Gal, A., Friedman, S. P., and Russo, D.: The effect of static chamber base on N2O flux in drip irrigation, Biogeosciences, 19, 3699–3711, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3699-2022, 2022. 5. Brutsaert, W.: Evaporation into the Atmosphere,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1497-6, 1982.
|
|