Abstract
Abstract. Many small-scale water development initiatives are accompanied by hydrological research to study either the shape of the intervention or its impacts. Humans influence both, and thus one needs to take human agency into account. This paper focuses on the effects of human actions in the intervention and its associated hydrological research, as these effects have not yet been discussed explicitly in a systematic way. In this paper, we propose a systematic planning, based on evaluating three hydrological research projects in small-scale water intervention projects in Vietnam, Kenya, and Indonesia. The main purpose of the three projects was to understand the functioning of interventions in their hydrological contexts. Aiming for better decision-making on hydrological research in small-scale water intervention projects, we propose two analysis steps: (1) being prepared for surprises and (2) cost-benefit analysis. By performing the two analyses continuously throughout a small-scale hydrological intervention based project, effective hydrological research can be achieved.
Reference88 articles.
1. Anyi, M., Kirke, B., and Ali, S.: Remote community electrification in Sarawak, Malaysia, Renew. Energ., 35, 1609–1613, 2010.
2. Arnstein, S. R.: A ladder of citizen participation, J. Am. I. Planners, 35, 216–224, 1969.
3. Athy, L. F.: Density, porosity, and compaction of sedimentary rocks, AAPG Bull., 14, 1–22, 1930.
4. Baiocchi, D. and Fox, D. S.: Surprise! From CEOs to Navy SEALs: How a Select Group of Professionals Prepare for and Respond to the Unexpected, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 2013.
5. Balakrishnan, B.: Women and Micro-Hydro Systems, Himalayan Small Hydropower Summit, New Delhi, 2006.