Effects of finite source rupture on landslide triggering: the 2016 <i>M</i><sub>w</sub> 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
-
Published:2019-04-04
Issue:2
Volume:10
Page:463-486
-
ISSN:1869-9529
-
Container-title:Solid Earth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Solid Earth
Author:
von Specht SebastianORCID, Ozturk UgurORCID, Veh GeorgORCID, Cotton Fabrice, Korup Oliver
Abstract
Abstract. The propagation of a seismic rupture on a fault introduces spatial variations
in the seismic wave field surrounding the fault. This directivity effect
results in larger shaking amplitudes in the rupture propagation direction.
Its seismic radiation pattern also causes amplitude variations between the
strike-normal and strike-parallel components of horizontal ground motion. We
investigated the landslide response to these effects during the 2016 Kumamoto
earthquake (Mw 7.1) in central Kyushu (Japan). Although the
distribution of some 1500 earthquake-triggered landslides as a function of
rupture distance is consistent with the observed Arias intensity, the
landslides were more concentrated to the northeast of the
southwest–northeast striking rupture. We examined several landslide
susceptibility factors: hillslope inclination, the median amplification
factor (MAF) of ground shaking, lithology, land cover, and topographic
wetness. None of these factors sufficiently explains the landslide
distribution or orientation (aspect), although the landslide head scarps have
an elevated hillslope inclination and MAF. We propose a new physics-based
ground-motion model (GMM) that
accounts for the seismic rupture effects, and we demonstrate that the
low-frequency seismic radiation pattern is consistent with the overall
landslide distribution. Its spatial pattern is influenced by the rupture
directivity effect, whereas landslide aspect is influenced by amplitude
variations between the fault-normal and
fault-parallel motion at frequencies <2 Hz. This azimuth dependence
implies that comparable landslide concentrations can occur at different
distances from the rupture. This quantitative link between the prevalent
landslide aspect and the low-frequency seismic radiation pattern can improve
coseismic landslide hazard assessment.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Paleontology,Stratigraphy,Earth-Surface Processes,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics,Soil Science
Reference100 articles.
1. Aki, K. and Richards, P. G.: Quantitative seismology, 2nd ed. University
Science Books, 704 pp., 2002. a, b, c, d 2. Allstadt, K.: Extracting source characteristics and dynamics of the August
2010 Mount Meager landslide from broadband seismograms, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth, 118, 1472–1490, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20110,
2013. a 3. Allstadt, K. E., Jibson, R. W., Thompson, E. M., Massey, C. I., Wald, D. J.,
Godt, J. W., and Rengers, F. K.: Improving Near-Real-Time Coseismic
Landslide Models: Lessons Learned from the 2016 Kaikoura, New Zealand,
Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 108,
1649–1664, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170297,
2018. a 4. Anderson, J. G. and Richards, P. G.: Comparison of Strong Ground Motion from
Several Dislocation Models*, Geophys. J. Int., 42, 347–373, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb05866.x,
1975. a, b, c 5. Arias, A.: Measure of earthquake intensity, Tech. rep., Massachusetts
Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, Univ. of Chile, Santiago de Chile, 1970. a, b
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|