Impact of droughts on the C-cycle in European vegetation: a probabilistic risk analysis using six vegetation models
Author:
Van Oijen M.ORCID, Balkovič J., Beer C., Cameron D., Ciais P., Cramer W.ORCID, Kato T., Kuhnert M., Martin R., Myneni R., Rammig A.ORCID, Rolinski S., Soussana J.-F., Thonicke K.ORCID, Van der Velde M., Xu L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. We analyse how climate change may alter risks posed by droughts to carbon fluxes in European ecosystems. The approach follows a recently proposed framework for risk analysis based on probability theory. In this approach, risk is quantified as the product of hazard probability and ecosystem vulnerability. The probability of a drought hazard is calculated here from the Standardised Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index. Vulnerability is calculated from the response to drought simulated by process-based vegetation models. Here we use six different models: three for generic vegetation (JSBACH, LPJmL, ORCHIDEE) and three for specific ecosystems (Scots pine forests: BASFOR; winter wheat fields: EPIC; grasslands: PASIM). The periods 1971–2000 and 2071–2100 are compared. Climate data are based on observations and on output from the regional climate model REMO using the SRES A1B scenario. The risk analysis is carried out for ∼22 000 grid cells of 0.25° × 0.25° across Europe. For each grid cell, drought vulnerability and risk are quantified for five seasonal variables: net primary and ecosystem productivity (NPP, NEP), heterotrophic respiration (RH), soil water content and evapotranspiration. Climate change is expected to lead to increased drought risks to net primary productivity in the Mediterranean area: five of the models estimate that risk will exceed 15%. The risks will increase mainly because of greater drought probability; ecosystem vulnerability will increase to lesser extent. Because NPP will be affected more than RH, future C-sequestration (NEP) will also be at risk predominantly in southern Europe, with risks exceeding 0.25 g C m−2 d−1 according to most models, amounting to reductions in carbon sequestration of 20 to 80%.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference76 articles.
1. Arbez, M., Birot, Y., and Carnus, J.-M.: Risk Management and Sustainable Forestry, EFI Proceedings No. 45, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, 2002. 2. Balkoviè, J., Van der Velde, M., Schmid, E., Skalský, R., Khabarov, N., Obersteiner, M., Stürmer, B., and Xiong, W.: Pan-European crop modelling with EPIC: implementation, up-scaling and regional crop yield validation, Agr. Syst., 120, 61–75, 2013. 3. Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., and Berry, J. A.: A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions, Prog. Photosynthesis Res., 4, 221–224, 1987. 4. Bartholomé, E. and Belward, A. S.: GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1959–1977, 2005. 5. Beer, C., Weber, U., Tomelleri, E., Carvalhais, N., Mahecha, M. D., and Reichstein, M.: Harmonized European long-term climate data for assessing the effect of changing temporal variability on land–atmosphere CO2 fluxes, J. Climate, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00543.1, 2014.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|