Plant spatial aggregation modulates the interplay between plant competition and pollinator attraction with contrasting outcomes of plant fitness
-
Published:2023-03-29
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:51-69
-
ISSN:1399-1183
-
Container-title:Web Ecology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Web Ecol.
Author:
Hurtado MaríaORCID, Godoy OscarORCID, Bartomeus IgnasiORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Ecosystem functions such as seed production are
the result of a complex interplay between competitive plant–plant
interactions and mutualistic pollinator–plant interactions. In this
interplay, spatial plant aggregation could work in two different directions:
it could increase hetero- and conspecific competition, thus reducing seed
production; but it could also attract pollinators, increasing plant fitness.
To shed light on how plant spatial arrangement modulates this balance, we
conducted a field study in a Mediterranean annual grassland with three focal plant species with different phenology, Chamaemelum fuscatum (early phenology), Leontodon maroccanus (middle
phenology) and Pulicaria paludosa (late phenology), and a diverse guild of pollinators (flies,
bees, beetles and butterflies). All three species showed spatial
aggregation of conspecific individuals. Additionally, we found that the two
mechanisms were working simultaneously: crowded neighborhoods reduced
individual seed production via plant–plant competition, but they also made
individual plants more attractive for some pollinator guilds, increasing
visitation rates and plant fitness. The balance between these two forces
varied depending on the focal species and the spatial scale considered.
Therefore, our results indicate that mutualistic interactions do not always
effectively compensate for competitive interactions in situations of spatial
aggregation of flowering plants, at least in our study system. We highlight
the importance of explicitly considering the spatial structure at different
spatial scales of multitrophic interactions to better understand individual
plant fitness and community dynamics.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference60 articles.
1. Albor, C., García-Franco, J. G., Parra-Tabla, V., Díaz-Castelazo, C., and Arceo-Gómez, G.:Taxonomic and functional diversity of the co-flowering community differentially affect Cakile edentula pollination at different spatial scales, J. Ecol., 107, 2167–2181,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13183, 2019. 2. Antonovics, J. and Levin, D. A.: The ecological and genetic consequences of
density-dependent regulation in plants, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 11, 411–452,
1980. 3. Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M., and Wilks, A. R.: The New S Language,
Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, ISBN 9780534091934, 1988. 4. Bergamo, P. J., Streher, N. S., Wolowski, M., and Sazima, M.:
Pollinator-mediated facilitation is associated with floral abundance, trait
similarity and enhanced community-level fitness, J. Ecol., 108,
1334–1346, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13348, 2020. 5. Bivand, R. S. and Wong D. W. S.: Comparing implementations of global and
local indicators of spatial association, Test, 27, 716–748,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x, 2018.
|
|