Validation of XCO<sub>2</sub> derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data
-
Published:2013-10-02
Issue:19
Volume:13
Page:9771-9788
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Inoue M.ORCID, Morino I.ORCID, Uchino O., Miyamoto Y., Yoshida Y.ORCID, Yokota T., Machida T., Sawa Y., Matsueda H., Sweeney C., Tans P. P., Andrews A. E., Biraud S. C., Tanaka T., Kawakami S., Patra P. K.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Column-averaged dry air mole fractions of carbon dioxide (XCO2) retrieved from Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) Short-Wavelength InfraRed (SWIR) observations were validated with aircraft measurements by the Comprehensive Observation Network for TRace gases by AIrLiner (CONTRAIL) project, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the US Department of Energy (DOE), the National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) program, and the GOSAT validation aircraft observation campaign over Japan. To calculate XCO2 based on aircraft measurements (aircraft-based XCO2), tower measurements and model outputs were used for additional information near the surface and above the tropopause, respectively. Before validation, we investigated the impacts of GOSAT SWIR column averaging kernels (CAKs) and the shape of a priori profiles on the aircraft-based XCO2 calculation. The differences between aircraft-based XCO2 with and without the application of GOSAT CAK were evaluated to be less than ±0.4 ppm at most, and less than ±0.1 ppm on average. Therefore, we concluded that the GOSAT CAK produces only a minor effect on the aircraft-based XCO2 calculation in terms of the overall uncertainty of GOSAT XCO2. We compared GOSAT data retrieved within ±2 or ±5° latitude/longitude boxes centered at each aircraft measurement site to aircraft-based data measured on a GOSAT overpass day. The results indicated that GOSAT XCO2 over land regions agreed with aircraft-based XCO2, except that the former is biased by −0.68 ppm (−0.99 ppm) with a standard deviation of 2.56 ppm (2.51 ppm), whereas the averages of the differences between the GOSAT XCO2 over ocean and the aircraft-based XCO2 were −1.82 ppm (−2.27 ppm) with a standard deviation of 1.04 ppm (1.79 ppm) for ±2° (±5°) boxes.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference68 articles.
1. Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J., Bakwin, P. S., Zhao, C., and Tans, P.: Carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide dry air mole fractions from the NOAA ESRL tall tower network, 1992-2009, Version: 2011-08-31, available at: ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/towers/ (last access: July 2013), 2011. 2. Araki, M., Morino, I., Machida, T., Sawa, Y., Matsueda, H., Ohyama, H, Yokota, T., and Uchino, O.: CO2 column-averaged volume mixing ratio derived over Tsukuba from measurements by commercial airlines, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7659–7667, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7659-2010, 2010. 3. Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Smith, J. R., Sweeney, C., Riley, W. J., and Tans, P. P.: A multi-year record of airborne CO2 observations in the US Southern Great Plains, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 751–763, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-751-2013, 2013. 4. Chédin, A., Serrar, S., Armante, R., and Scott, N. A.: Signatures of annual and seasonal variations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases from comparisons between NOAA TOVS observations and radiation model simulations, J. Climate, 15, 95–116, 2002. 5. Christi, M. J. and Stephens, G. L.: Retrieving profiles of atmospheric CO2 in clear sky and in the presence of thin cloud using spectroscopy from the near and thermal infrared: a preliminary case study. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D04316, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004058, 2004.
Cited by
62 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|