High-resolution long-term average groundwater recharge in Africa estimated using random forest regression and residual interpolation
-
Published:2024-07-05
Issue:13
Volume:28
Page:2949-2967
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Pazola Anna, Shamsudduha MohammadORCID, French Jon, MacDonald Alan M.ORCID, Abiye Tamiru, Goni Ibrahim Baba, Taylor Richard G.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Groundwater recharge is a key hydrogeological variable that informs the renewability of groundwater resources. Long-term average (LTA) groundwater recharge provides a measure of replenishment under the prevailing climatic and land-use conditions and is therefore of considerable interest in assessing the sustainability of groundwater withdrawals globally. This study builds on the modelling results by MacDonald et al. (2021), who produced the first LTA groundwater recharge map across Africa using a linear mixed model (LMM) rooted in 134 ground-based studies. Here, continent-wide predictions of groundwater recharge were generated using random forest (RF) regression employing five variables (precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, soil moisture, normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) and aridity index) at a higher spatial resolution (0.1° resolution) to explore whether an improved model might be achieved through machine learning. Through the development of a series of RF models, we confirm that a RF model is able to generate maps of higher spatial variability than a LMM; the performance of final RF models in terms of the goodness of fit (R2=0.83; 0.88 with residual kriging) is comparable to the LMM (R2=0.86). The higher spatial scale of the predictor data (0.1°) in RF models better preserves small-scale variability from predictor data than the values provided via interpolated LMMs; these may prove useful in testing global- to local-scale models. The RF model remains, nevertheless, constrained by its representation of focused recharge and by the limited range of recharge studies in humid, equatorial Africa, especially in the areas of high precipitation. This confers substantial uncertainty in model estimates.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference77 articles.
1. Abouelmagd, A., Sultan, M., Milewski, A., Kehew, A. E., Sturchio, N. C., Soliman, F., Krishnamurthy, R., and Cutrim, E.: Toward a better understanding of palaeoclimatic regimes that recharged the fossil aquifers in North Africa: Inferences from stable isotope and remote sensing data, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. Palaeoecol., 329–330, 137–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.02.024, 2012. a 2. Al-Fugara, A., Pourghasemi, H. R., Al-Shabeeb, A. R., Habib, M., Al-Adamat, R., AI-Amoush, H., and Collins, A. L.: A comparison of machine learning models for the mapping of groundwater spring potential, Environ. Earth Sci., 79, 206, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08944-1, 2020. a 3. Altchenko, Y. and Villholth, K. G.: Mapping irrigation potential from renewable groundwater in Africa – a quantitative hydrological approach, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1055–1067, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1055-2015, 2015. a 4. Berghuijs, W. R., Luijendijk, E., Moeck, C., van der Velde, Y., and Allen, S. T.: Global Recharge Data Set Indicates Strengthened Groundwater Connection to Surface Fluxes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099010, 2022. a, b 5. Boehmke, B. and Greenwell, B.: Feature & Target Engineering, in: Chap. 3, p. 42, ISBN 9780367816377, https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367816377, 2019. a
|
|