A comparison of eight optimization methods applied to a wind farm layout optimization problem
-
Published:2023-06-01
Issue:5
Volume:8
Page:865-891
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Thomas Jared J.ORCID, Baker Nicholas F., Malisani Paul, Quaeghebeur ErikORCID, Sanchez Perez-Moreno Sebastian, Jasa John, Bay ChristopherORCID, Tilli FedericoORCID, Bieniek David, Robinson Nick, Stanley Andrew P. J., Holt Wesley, Ning AndrewORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Selecting a wind farm layout optimization method is difficult. Comparisons between optimization methods in different papers can be uncertain due to the difficulty of exactly reproducing the objective function. Comparisons by just a few authors in one paper can be uncertain if the authors do not have experience using each algorithm. In this work we provide an algorithm comparison for a wind farm layout optimization case study between eight optimization methods applied, or directed, by researchers who developed those algorithms or who had other experience using them. We provided the objective function to each researcher to avoid ambiguity about relative performance due to a difference in objective function. While these comparisons are not perfect, we try to treat each algorithm more fairly by having researchers with experience using each algorithm apply each algorithm and by having a common objective function provided for analysis. The case study is from the International Energy Association (IEA) Wind Task 37, based on the Borssele III and IV wind farms with 81 turbines. Of particular interest in this case study is the presence of disconnected boundary regions and concave boundary features. The optimization methods studied represent a wide range of approaches, including gradient-free, gradient-based, and hybrid methods; discrete and continuous problem formulations; single-run and multi-start approaches; and mathematical and heuristic algorithms. We provide descriptions and references (where applicable) for each optimization method, as well as lists of pros and cons, to help readers determine an appropriate method for their use case. All the optimization methods perform similarly, with optimized wake loss values between 15.48 % and 15.70 % as compared to 17.28 % for the unoptimized provided layout. Each of the layouts found were different, but all layouts exhibited similar characteristics. Strong similarities across all the layouts include tightly packing wind turbines along the outer borders, loosely spacing turbines in the internal regions, and allocating similar numbers of turbines to each discrete boundary region. The best layout by annual energy production (AEP) was found using a new sequential allocation method, discrete exploration-based optimization (DEBO). Based on the results in this study, it appears that using an optimization algorithm can significantly improve wind farm performance, but there are many optimization methods that can perform well on the wind farm layout optimization problem, given that they are applied correctly.
Funder
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Ministerie van Economische Zaken
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference57 articles.
1. Arnoud, A., Guvenen, F., and Kleineberg, T.: Benchmarking Global Optimizers,
Working Paper 26340, National Bureau of Economic Research,
https://doi.org/10.3386/w26340, 2019. a 2. Baker, N. F., Stanley, A. P. J., Thomas, J. J., Ning, A., and Dykes, K.: Best
Practices for Wake Model and Optimization Algorithm Selection in Wind Farm
Layout Optimization, in: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA,
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0540, 2019. a, b, c, d, e 3. Baker, N. F., Thomas, J. J., Stanley, A. P. J., and Ning, A.: IEA Task 37
Wind Farm Layout Optimization Case Studies, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5809681, 2021. a, b, c, d 4. Bastankhah, M. and Porté-Agel, F.: Experimental and theoretical study of wind
turbine wakes in yawed conditions, J. Fluid Mech., 806,
506–541, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.595, 2016. a 5. Belegundu, A. D. and Chandrupatla, T. R.: Optimization Concepts and
Applications in Engineering, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, ISBN 13:978-0521878463, 2011. a
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|