Evaluation of air–soil temperature relationships simulated by land surface
models during winter across the permafrost region
-
Published:2016-08-11
Issue:4
Volume:10
Page:1721-1737
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Wang Wenli, Rinke AnnetteORCID, Moore John C., Ji DuoyingORCID, Cui Xuefeng, Peng ShushiORCID, Lawrence David M.ORCID, McGuire A. David, Burke Eleanor J.ORCID, Chen XiaodongORCID, Decharme BertrandORCID, Koven CharlesORCID, MacDougall Andrew, Saito Kazuyuki, Zhang WenxinORCID, Alkama Ramdane, Bohn Theodore J., Ciais Philippe, Delire Christine, Gouttevin IsabelleORCID, Hajima Tomohiro, Krinner Gerhard, Lettenmaier Dennis P., Miller Paul A., Smith BenjaminORCID, Sueyoshi Tetsuo, Sherstiukov Artem B.
Abstract
Abstract. A realistic simulation of snow cover and its thermal properties are important for accurate modelling of permafrost. We analyse simulated relationships between air and near-surface (20 cm) soil temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere permafrost region during winter, with a particular focus on snow insulation effects in nine land surface models, and compare them with observations from 268 Russian stations. There are large cross-model differences in the simulated differences between near-surface soil and air temperatures (ΔT; 3 to 14 °C), in the sensitivity of soil-to-air temperature (0.13 to 0.96 °C °C−1), and in the relationship between ΔT and snow depth. The observed relationship between ΔT and snow depth can be used as a metric to evaluate the effects of each model's representation of snow insulation, hence guide improvements to the model's conceptual structure and process parameterisations. Models with better performance apply multilayer snow schemes and consider complex snow processes. Some models show poor performance in representing snow insulation due to underestimation of snow depth and/or overestimation of snow conductivity. Generally, models identified as most acceptable with respect to snow insulation simulate reasonable areas of near-surface permafrost (13.19 to 15.77 million km2). However, there is not a simple relationship between the sophistication of the snow insulation in the acceptable models and the simulated area of Northern Hemisphere near-surface permafrost, because several other factors, such as soil depth used in the models, the treatment of soil organic matter content, hydrology and vegetation cover, also affect the simulated permafrost distribution.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference71 articles.
1. Anderson, E. A.: A point energy and mass balance model of a snow cover, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland, NOAA Technical Report NWS 19, 1976. 2. Andreadis, K., Storck, P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05429, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007042, 2009. 3. Anisimov, O. A. and Sherstiukov A. B.: Evaluating the effect of environmental factors on permafrost factors in Russia, Earth's Cryosphere, 90–99, 2016. 4. Avis, C. A.: Simulating the present-day and future distribution of permafrost in the UVic Earth System Climate Model, Dissertation, University of Victoria, Canada, 274 pp., 2012. 5. Bartlett, P. A., MacKay, M. D., and Verseghy, D. L.: Modified snow algorithms in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme: model runs and sensitivity analysis at three boreal forest stands, Atmos. Ocean, 44, 207–222, 2006.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|