Seasonal mass variations show timing and magnitude of meltwater storage in the Greenland Ice Sheet
-
Published:2018-09-21
Issue:9
Volume:12
Page:2981-2999
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Ran JiangjunORCID, Vizcaino MirenORCID, Ditmar PavelORCID, van den Broeke Michiel R.ORCID, Moon TwilaORCID, Steger Christian R., Enderlin Ellyn M.ORCID, Wouters Bert, Noël BriceORCID, Reijmer Catharina H., Klees RolandORCID, Zhong Min, Liu LinORCID, Fettweis XavierORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) is currently losing ice mass. In order to
accurately predict future sea level rise, the mechanisms driving the observed
mass loss must be better understood. Here, we combine data from the satellite
gravimetry mission Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), surface
mass balance (SMB) output of the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model v. 2
(RACMO2), and ice discharge estimates to analyze the mass budget of Greenland
at various temporal and spatial scales. We find that the mean rate of mass
variations in Greenland observed by GRACE was between −277 and
−269 Gt yr−1 in 2003–2012. This estimate is consistent with the sum
(i.e., -304±126 Gt yr−1) of individual contributions – surface
mass balance (SMB, 216±122 Gt yr−1) and ice discharge (520±31 Gt yr−1) – and with previous studies. We further identify a
seasonal mass anomaly throughout the GRACE record that peaks in July at
80–120 Gt and which we interpret to be due to a combination of englacial
and subglacial water storage generated by summer surface melting. The
robustness of this estimate is demonstrated by using both different
GRACE-based solutions and different meltwater runoff estimates (namely,
RACMO2.3, SNOWPACK, and MAR3.9). Meltwater storage
in the ice sheet occurs primarily due to storage in the high-accumulation
regions of the southeast and northwest parts of Greenland. Analysis of
seasonal variations in outlet glacier discharge shows that the contribution
of ice discharge to the observed signal is minor (at the level of only a few
gigatonnes) and does not explain the seasonal differences between the total
mass and SMB signals. With the improved quantification of meltwater storage
at the seasonal scale, we highlight its importance for understanding
glacio-hydrological processes and their contributions to the ice sheet mass
variability.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference51 articles.
1. A, G., Wahr, J., and Zhong, S.: Computations of the viscoelastic response of a
3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial
Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada, Geophys. J.
Inte., 192, 557–572, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs030,
2013. a 2. Ahlstrøm, A. P., Andersen, S. B., Andersen, M. L., Machguth, H., Nick,
F. M., Joughin, I., Reijmer, C. H., van de Wal, R. S. W., Merryman Boncori,
J. P., Box, J. E., Citterio, M., van As, D., Fausto, R. S., and Hubbard, A.:
Seasonal velocities of eight major marine-terminating outlet glaciers of the
Greenland ice sheet from continuous in situ GPS instruments, Earth Syst.
Sci. Data, 5, 277–287, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-277-2013, 2013. a 3. Alexander, P. M., Tedesco, M., Schlegel, N.-J., Luthcke, S. B., Fettweis, X.,
and Larour, E.: Greenland Ice Sheet seasonal and spatial mass variability
from model simulations and GRACE (2003–2012), The Cryosphere, 10,
1259–1277, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-1259-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d 4. Baur, O. and Sneeuw, N.: Assessing Greenland ice mass loss by means of
point-mass modeling: A viable methodology, J. Geodesy, 85, 607–615,
2011. a 5. Chandler, D., Wadham, J., Lis, G., Cowton, T., Sole, A., Bartholomew, I.,
Telling, J., Nienow, P., Bagshaw, E., Mair, D., Vinen, S., and Hubbard, A.: Evolution of the
subglacial drainage system beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet revealed by
tracers, Nat. Geosci., 6, 195–198, 2013. a
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|