Comparison of surface ozone simulation among selected regional models in MICS-Asia III – effects of chemistry and vertical transport for the causes of difference
-
Published:2019-01-16
Issue:1
Volume:19
Page:603-615
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Akimoto Hajime, Nagashima Tatsuya, Li Jie, Fu Joshua S.ORCID, Ji DongshengORCID, Tan JianiORCID, Wang Zifa
Abstract
Abstract. In order to clarify the causes of variability among the model outputs for
surface ozone in the Model Intercomparison Study Asia Phase III (MICS-Asia III),
three regional models, CMAQ v.5.0.2, CMAQ v.4.7.1, and NAQPMS
(abbreviated as NAQM in this paper), have been selected. Detailed analyses of
monthly averaged diurnal variation have been performed for selected grids
covering the metropolitan areas of Beijing and Tokyo and at a remote oceanic
site, Oki. The chemical reaction mechanism, SAPRC99, used in the CMAQ models
tended to give a higher net chemical ozone production than CBM-Z used in
NAQM, agreeing with previous studies. Inclusion of the heterogeneous
“renoxification” reaction of HNO3 (on soot surface)→NO+NO2
only in NAQM would give a higher NO concentration resulting in a
better agreement with observational data for NO and nighttime O3 mixing
ratios. In addition to chemical processes, the difference in the vertical
transport of O3 was found to affect the simulated results significantly.
Particularly, the increase in downward O3 flux from the upper layer to
the surface after dawn was found to be substantially different among the
models. Larger early morning vertical transport of O3 simulated by CMAQ 5.0.2
is thought to be the reason for higher daytime O3 in July in this
model. All three models overestimated the daytime ozone by ca. 20 ppbv at
the remote site Oki in July, where in situ photochemical activity is minimal.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Akimoto, H.: Atmospheric Reaction Chemistry, Springer Japan, Tokyo, 2016. 2. Binkowski, F. S. and Roselle, S. J.: Models-3 Community Multiscale Air
Quality(CMAQ) model aerosol component 1. Model description, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 4183, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001409, 2003. 3. Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Rogers, H. L., Köhler, M. O., Pyle, J. A., Hauglustaine, D. A.,
Jourdain, L., Berntsen, T. K., Gauss, M., Isaksen, I. S. A., Meijer, E., van Velthoven, P.,
Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Grewe, V., and Sausen, R.: An evaluation of the performance of
chemistry transport models – Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected
campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 107–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005, 2005. 4. Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abatt, J. P. D., Barker, J. R., Huie, R.
E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P.
H.: Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation
Number 18, JPL Publication 15-10, Pasadena, California,
available at: http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov/ (last access: 31 July 2018), 2015. 5. Carter, W. L.: Implementation of the SAPRC-99 chemical mechanism into the
Models-3 framework, Report to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency, 29 January 2000.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|