Author:
ISYCHENKO IGOR,PROTAS MARYNA,MIRONOVA TATIANA,BOKOTEI MYKHAILO,BULAVINA NATALIIA
Abstract
The authors argue that during wartime in Ukraine, public sculpture serves as a reflection of the memory politics of the contemporary Ukrainian state. As such, these politics are aimed at breaking away from the Soviet legacy that continues to exist simultaneously in the form of hidden or sometimes obvious remnants of older colonial narratives of Ukrainian history and in the form of aesthetic artifacts akin to those that can be seen in the public space of big cities, e.g. sculptures and reliefs, etc. However, in its efforts to shed the Soviet legacy, Ukraine's memory politics often uncritically adopt dominant capitalist narratives, inadvertently perpetuating another form of cultural oppression and colonization. In addition to critiquing contemporary market-driven discourse, the authors stress the importance of not overlooking the layer of mythological memory, as it constitutes one of the most fundamental elements of Europe's cultural landscape.
Reference18 articles.
1. Arendt, H. (1961) Between past and future. Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: The Viking Press. 6, 10–11, 171.
2. Baker, M. (2022) The Western Mathematic and the Ontological Turn: Ethnomathematics and Cosmotechnics for the Pluriverse. Indigenous Knowledge and Ethnomathematics. Springer International Publishing, 243-276. https://doi.org /10.1007/978-3-030-97482-4_9
3. Bosenko, O. (2020) Free Atonality. Kyiv: Phoenix, 14, 314.
4. Bosenko, O. (2021) Last time-ІІ. Free time as the fulfillment of all times. Kyiv: Phoenix, 11–16.
5. Judt, T. (2023) Postwar. A history of Europe since 1945. Kyiv: Nash Format, 806.