Author:
ARCHALOUSOVA ALEXANDRA,ANDRASCIKOVA STEFANIA
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to determine which NANDA nursing diagnosis are made and which related NIC nursing interventions are carried out most frequently by clinical nursing experts. Methods: The Likert Scale and Fehring´s Diagnostic Content Validity Model (DCV model) were used for the research. Sample: The total number of all participants of the validation research, i.e. academic nurses/experts, and clinical nurses/experts (nc=848) from 2 countries – SR and CR, consisted of 4 subsamples. A total of 69 items – activities of two interventions for NIC nursing diagnosis: Risk for Infection 00004 were evaluated. Results: We found out that the total set of experts rated all activities/practices of Intervention I and II as significant. Conclusion: The results of the international study provide valid findings for the development of nursing care and curriculum for future professionals.
Reference14 articles.
1. ANCIRA-MORENO, M. et al. 2022. Development and validation of a new set of indicators to assess the quality of maternal and child nutritional care at the primary care [online] z PubMed Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/22.
2. ANIN, K. et al. 2022. Predictive Utility of Composite Child Feeding Indices (CCFIs) for Child Nutritional Status: Compa rative Analyses for the Most Suitable Formula for Constructing an Optimum CCFI [online] z PubMed Available at: https://www.mdpi .com/1660-4601/19/11/6621.
3. ARCHALOUSOVÁ, A. a kol. 2022. Expert validace. Validace ošetřovatelských intervencí pro vzdělávání, výzkum a klinickou praxi z pohledu experta. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita, 2022. 116 s. ISBN-978-80-261-0752-1.
4. BUTCHER, H. K. et al. 2018. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 7th edition. Elsevier, 2018. 512 p. ISBN 978-0-323-49770-1.
5. CARPENITO-MOYET, L. J. 2004. Nursing Diagnosis: Aplication to Clinical Practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia U.S.A.: Lippincott Company, 2004. 635 p. ISBN 0-7817-4354-0.