Abstract
Water-saving strategies play an important role in improving the resilience of water scarcity in arid and semi-arid areas. This paper has compared the advantages and disadvantages of four kinds of water-saving irrigation methods commonly used in arid/semi-arid areas: rainwater harvesting irrigation, plastic film mulching technology, deficit irrigation, and alternate furrow irrigation. The finding of this study is that biological water-saving which can improve the biological drought tolerance is more cost-effective of further study than the technological water-saving. It can be seen that the latter two (biological water-saving irrigation measures) have lower cost, stronger operability and more promising development prospects. Im addition, future research is suggested to focus more on automatic intelligence to pursue accurate irrigation.
Reference28 articles.
1. Talip T, Ustun S, Salih E, Erdal D, Erdal G, Rafet A. The deficit irrigation productivity and economy in strawberry in the different drip irrigation practices in a high plain with semi-arid climat.J. Sci.Hort. 245 (2019).
2. Li C.M., Gao S. H. The evolution law and supply and demand of water resources in arid and semi-arid areas in north China .J. J.Soil Water Cons,.(02):68-71 (2002). (In Chinese)
3. Oweis T., & Hachum A. Water harvesting and supplemental irrigation for improved water productivity of dry farming systems in West Asia and North Africa Agric. Water Manag, 80 (1-3),57–73(2006)
4. A GIS-based decision support system for rainwater harvesting (RHADESS)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献