Author:
Suherman Suherman,Peni Barokah Nur,Atika Islamiaty Nora,Hadiyanto Hadiyanto,Rayyan Fitra Sinuhaji Tubagus,Waluyo Hadi Eko Prasetiyono Bambang,Lomi Abraham,Hendroko Setyobudi Roy,Illayan Massadeh Muhannad,Yandri Erkata
Abstract
This study aims to assess hybrid solar drying method for processing red pepper compared to sun drying and solar drying. Independently selecting heat variables of 40 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, and 80 °C, the temperature profiles, drying curves, thermal efficiency and effectiveness, and energy and exergy were analyzed to meet the standardized moisture content of the product as well as other features (color, vitamin C content, and β-carotene content). It was found that the drying rate decreased when the temperature rose, while the drying chamber efficiency and drying effectiveness were inversely proportional to the duration. The collector became the most efficient at 40 °C. The drying air temperature is directly proportional to utility, energy efficiency, exergy input, exergy ouput, exergy loss, exergetic efficiency, and development potential while inversely proportional to the energy utilization ratio. Drying red pepper with a hybrid solar dryer at all observed temperatures was deemed able to meet the nationally standardized water content of ≤ 10.78 %. Processing red pepper at 80 °C resulted in the L, a, and b values of color analysis of 30.37, 27.45, and 10.63 respectively, vitamin C content of 14.79 g 100 g–1, and β-carotene content of 4.43 mg 100 g–1.
Reference46 articles.
1. Sumarno F.G., Studi eksperimental alat pengering kerupuk udang bentuk limas kapasitas 25 kg per proses dengan menggunakan energi surya dan energi biomassa arang kayu [Experimental study of a pyramid-shaped shrimp cracker dryer with a capacity of 25 kg per process using solar energy and wood charcoal biomass energy] [Online] from https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=ucIWRpMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=ucIWRpMAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC (2011) [in Bahasa Indonesia]
2. Yanuarti A.R., Afsari M.D., Profil komoditas barang kebutuhan pokok dan barang penting: Komoditas cabai [Commodity profile of basic necessities and important goods: Chili commodities]. Jakarta, Direktorat Jenderal Perdagangan Dalam Negeri Kementerian Perdagangan (2016). p.70 [in Bahasa Indonesia] https://docplayer.info/84988606-Profil-komoditas-barang-kebutuhan-pokok-dan-barang-penting-komoditas-cabai.html
3. Mahmud M.K., Zulfianto N.A. (Ed.). Tabel komposisi pangan Indonesia [Indonesian food composition table] Jakarta, Elex Media Komputindo (2009). p.65 [in Bahasa Indonesia] https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=CklbDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=-szMsg9Co-&sig=cDT-5hR8FnVPC02ncSnw9jc1IbQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
4. El-Ramady H.R., Domokos-Szabolcsy É., Abdalla N.A., Taha H.S., Fári M., Postharvest Management of Fruits and Vegetables Storage. In: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. Lichtfouse E. (Eds). Springer, Cham (2015). p.65–152 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09132-7_2