Comparing Centrifuge, Steady-State and Semi-Dynamic Methods for Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure Determination: New Insights

Author:

Pairoys Fabrice,Caubit Cyril,Alexander Micah,Ramos Javier

Abstract

Relative permeability and capillary pressure are essential parameters for understanding multiphase flow in porous media and scenarios of production in oil or gas reservoirs. There are several experimental methods for determining the relative permeability curves: unsteady-state (USS), steady-state (SS), and semi-dynamic (SD) methods. Each method has advantages and weaknesses. Although the USS approach leads to fast data results, the interpretation neglects the capillary pressure effects and provides a limited amount of data points obtained after breakthrough. The SS method is time consuming but enables covering a wider range of saturation with data points if the test is well designed. The SD method may be more time consuming than the SS method but provides both relative permeability to the injected phase and capillary pressure. The relative permeability to the produced phase is then determined by numerical means. The main objective of this study was to compare the water-oil relative permeability curves obtained from the steady-state and semi-dynamic methods performed at reservoir conditions with live fluids. Carbonate core plugs of same rock type and same properties were selected for this experimental program. The samples were brought to the same irreducible water saturation at a constant brine-oil capillary pressure using a centrifuge before being dynamically aged with live oil. In addition to monitoring the average saturation using material balance (MB), a linear X-ray scanner was used for in-situ saturation monitoring (ISSM) along the core samples. The oil relative permeability from the SD method was simulated with fixed water relative permeability and capillary pressure by history-matching the oil production and the differential pressure signal. Two additional centrifuge tests on twin plug were performed in order to measure imbibition capillary pressure and oil relative permeability at pseudo-reservoir conditions. This comparative study shows that the SD method provides similar capillary pressure and oil relative permeability curves to those obtained by centrifuge methods. Even if all Kr curves are in an acceptable envelop, some differences are observed between SD and SS Kr curves: several investigative leads are given to explain this discrepancy. It is also shown that a better saturation method needs to be implemented, especially when dealing with heterogeneous rocks. While a more robust ISSM method is being tested at TOTAL, the results presented in this paper are very encouraging.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Ramakrishnan T.S., Cappiello A., Chem. Eng. Sci., 46 (1991)

2. Lenormand R., Eisenzimmer A., Society of Core Analysts, SCA1993-22 (1993)

3. Lenormand R., Schmitz P., Society of Core Analysts, SCA1997-17 (1997)

4. Lombard J-M., Egermann P., Lenormand R., Society of Core Analysts, SCA2002-09 (2002)

5. Lombard J-M. et al., Society of Core Analysts, SCA2004-32 (2004)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3