Author:
Taridal Siti Aida Adha,Wianti Nur Isiyana,Arsyad Muhammad,Ekaputri Arifiana Shima
Abstract
The aim of the study was to capture the differences between Tolaki, Javanese, and Bugis ethnic in relation to their livelihoods in paddy upland farming activity. The study uses the post-positivism paradigm. In our research setting in Sulawesi drylands ecology, Tolaki local farmer, inhabit most areas of dry land, tend to be sub-subsistence and subsistence-oriented, their planting system is shifting cultivation, or the swidden farming, which was the legacy of their ancestors. Javanese tend to be subsistence and supra-subsistence oriented, while the Bugis farmer is expansive and supra-subsistence oriented. Another important message showed the symptoms of social polarization between the Tolaki and the Bugis as ethnic immigrants. The climax conditions will lead to social conflicts between Tolaki local farmer, Javanese, and Bugis migrants as a result of the emergence of social polarization.
Reference20 articles.
1. IFAD.
Smallholders, Food Security, and the environment. IFAD and UNEP. (2013)
2. Sukarman I.G. Subiksa S. Ritung.
Identification of potential dry land for food plant development in prospects for dryland agriculture for supporting food security.
Agricultural research and development agency Republic of Indonesia. (2012)
3. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA).
Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis
(Island Press,
Washington DC, 2005)
4. Navigating challenges and opportunities of land degradation and sustainable livelihood development in dryland social–ecological systems: a case study from Mexico
5. Tracing divergent livelihood pathways in the drylands: A perspective on two spatially proximate locations in Laikipia County, Kenya
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献