Author:
Ferreira Fernanda B.,Vieira Castorina S.,Lopes Maria de Lurdes,Ferreira Pedro G.
Abstract
The benefits of geosynthetic-reinforced soil systems over conventional earth-retaining structures are now well established. These reinforced systems are often subjected not only to static loads, but also to seismic and/or traffic loads, in which case the effects of repeated loading on soil-geosynthetic interaction characteristics should be properly considered. This study investigates the behaviour of a geogrid typically used for soil reinforcement under cyclic pullout loading through load-controlled laboratory pullout tests. To examine the influence of cyclic loading amplitude, number of cycles and static pullout force acting on the geogrid at the onset of cyclic loading, distinct loading patterns are considered. A well-graded residual soil from granite is used as backfill material. A comparison between the cyclic and monotonic pullout response of the reinforcement is then established in order to identify any potential strength loss attributed to cyclic loading. The experimental results show that the ultimate pullout resistance of the geogrid embedded in medium dense residual soil from granite may be adversely affected by cyclic loading. The cumulative cyclic displacements of the reinforcement are more pronounced during the initial loading cycles, but tend to stabilize with the increasing number of cycles when the soil is densely compacted. In the presence of dense soil, the cyclic strains of the geogrid specimen are particularly significant at the front section and almost negligible towards the back end.
Reference19 articles.
1. The influence of a cyclic loading history on soil-geogrid interaction under pullout condition
2. CEN “EN 13286–2 :2010. Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures - Part 2: Test methods for laboratory reference density and water content - Proctor compaction”, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
3. CEN “EN ISO 10319 :2015. Geosynthetics - Wide-width tensile test”, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
4. Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces – influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type
5. Ferreira F. B., Vieira C. S., and Lopes M. L.. “Pullout behavior of different geosynthetics - Influence of soil density and moisture content”, Front Built Environ, 6(12), pp. 1–13, 2020a, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00012