Review of Nielsen versus SMART in Heuristic Evaluation of Online Transportation Application

Author:

Firmansyah Frans,Riskinanto Anggar

Abstract

The increase in the number of users of online transportation applications is accompanied by a high number of complaints regarding usability issues. Meanwhile, there is the SMART method beside Nielsen’s method for heuristic evaluation that provides more emphasis on mobile application. The purpose of the research is to determine the fittest method in the heuristic evaluation of one of the online transportation applications in Indonesia. The research used a comparative study approach by comparing the number of obtained usability issues from Nielsen’s method and the SMART method. The evaluation process involved three usability experts who identify the usability issues in two types of frameworks, which are Nielsen’s and SMART. The findings of this study indicate that the SMART method discovers a higher number of issues around 7.7% (not significant) compared to the Nielsen method. The SMART method is also able to identify more issues across severity levels 2, 3, and 4. Based on these results, the SMART method is considered may be fitter than Nielsen’s method in evaluating online transportation applications in Indonesia. The research is expected to serve as a reference for conducting evaluations on mobile devices in Indonesia.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Reference8 articles.

1. MAXIM. Pengguna Terus Naik, Bertambah Lebih dari 2 Juta Pengguna di Kuartal 2 Tahun 2020, Apa Yang Menarik dari Maxim di Tahun Ini? [Users Continue to Rise, Adding Over 2 Million Users in Q2 of 2020, What’s Exciting about Maxim this Year?], 2020, [Online], Available: https://Id.Taximaxim.Com/Blog/2020/07/1856-Pengguna-Terus-Naik-Bertambah-Lebih-Dari-2-Juta-Pengguna-Di-Kuartal-2-Tahun-2020-Apa-Yang-Menarik-Dari-Maxim-Di-Tahun-Ini/, [Accessed: 2023]

2. Hendradewa A. P., Perbandingan Metode Evaluasi Usability (Studi Kasus : Penggunaan Perangkat Smartphone) [Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods (Case Study: Use of Smartphone Devices)] (2017) https://doi.org/10.20885/teknoin.vol23.iss1.art2

3. Othman M. K., Sulaiman M. N. S., & Aman S., Heuristic Evaluation: Comparing Generic and Specific Usability Heuristics for Identification of Usability Problems in a Living Museum Mobile Guide App. Adv. in Human-Com. Inter. (2018) doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1518682

4. Joyce G., & Lilley M., Towards the Development of Usability Heuristics for Native Smartphone Mobile Applications. LNCS, 8517 (2014)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3