Analysis of Automobile Wheel Counting using Novel adaboosting Algorithm with Accuracy Compared to Logistic Regression Algorithm

Author:

Manikanta K. Teja,Logu K.

Abstract

Aim: In order to determine the accuracy of a realtime traffic management system, this work compares novel adaboosting and logistic regression methods to forecast the AutoMobile Wheel Movement Counting. Materials and Methods: The dataset utilized in this article contains 12 columns or attributes and a total of 10,684 rows. The columns in the dataset are named Car Wheels, Bicycle Wheels, Motorcycle Wheels, and Truck Wheels. The data source link provided a sample size of 1,340 records. A Novel adaboosting algorithm (N=20) and Logistic regression (N=20) iterations are simulated by various parameters and automate vehicle monitoring systems to optimize the pH. The 40 iterations were calculated using CilnCal with G power 80% and CI of 95%. Results: Based on obtained results Novel adaboosting Algorithm has significantly better accuracy (84.71%) compared to Logistic regression Algorithm accuracy (80.60%). Statistical significance difference between Novel adaboosting and Logistic regression algorithm was found to be p=0.013 (Independent Sample T Test p<0.05). Conclusion: Novel adaboosting algorithms provide better results in Finding Road Traffic counting than Logistic regression algorithms.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3