Assessing the Environmental Impact of Advanced Energy Storage Solutions: A Comparative Lifecycle Analysis
-
Published:2024
Issue:
Volume:547
Page:03025
-
ISSN:2267-1242
-
Container-title:E3S Web of Conferences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:E3S Web of Conf.
Author:
Mishra Mukul,Dutt Amit,Saini Neha,Kalia Akhilesh,Madan Praney,Srikanth T.,Talukdar Soumita
Abstract
Biodiesel manufacturing from waste cooking oil has emerged as a potential alternative in the search of sustainable energy. This process helps mitigate environmental pollution and reduces reliance on fossil fuels. This research examines the catalytic efficiency of environmentally friendly catalysts in this process, with a specific emphasis on catalysts based on enzymes. It assesses their effectiveness in terms of the production of biodiesel, the rate of the chemical reactions, cost efficiency, and their influence on the environment. Experimental evidence demonstrates that enzyme-based catalysts have enhanced catalytic activity, leading to an average biodiesel production of 90%, outperforming traditional catalysts such as solid acids, bases, and heterogeneous metal catalysts. Moreover, enzyme catalysts exhibit enhanced reaction rates due to their unique enzymatic activity and gentle reaction conditions. The cost study shows that the manufacturing costs for enzyme catalysts are competitive, with an average total cost of $800, which is equivalent to traditional catalysts. Environmental impact evaluation emphasizes the sustainability of enzyme catalysts by demonstrating their lower energy consumption, waste production, and greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional alternatives. The results highlight the capacity of green catalysts, namely enzyme- based catalysts, to enhance sustainable biodiesel production methods, hence promoting a more eco-friendly and robust energy framework.
Reference38 articles.
1. Deep S., Banerjee S., Dixit S., and Vatin N. I., Buildings 12, (2022) 2. Shyamlal C., Shanmugavel R., Jappes J. T. W., Nair A., Ravichandran M., Abuthakeer S. S., Prakash C., Dixit S., and Vatin N. I., Materials 15, (2022) 3. Upadhyay G., Saxena K. K., Sehgal S., Mohammed K. A., Prakash C., Dixit S., and Buddhi D., Metals (Basel) 12, (2022) 4. Singh P., Adebanjo A., Shafiq N., Razak S. N. A., Kumar V., Farhan S. A., Adebanjo I., Singh A., Dixit S., Singh S., and Sergeevna M. T., International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (2023) 5. Makwana M., Patel A. M., Oza A. D., Prakash C., Gupta L. R., Vatin N. I., and Dixit S., Materials 15, (2022)
|
|