The ethics of Enlightenment in the foundations of modern science

Author:

Kurakina Olga D.

Abstract

In the Age of Enlightenment, when each person, in the opinion of Kant, was called upon to “think independently”, a transition from the medieval “cult of faith” to the enlightened “cult of reason” was finally formed and the ethical foundations of modern science were laid. The ethos of modern science, as a set of moral imperatives of the scientific community, was reduced in the middle of the twentieth century to a specific set of norms which are currently being challenged in view of the transformation of science into a technological industry, removing the personal responsibility of a scientist for the results of his creativity. The institutionalisation of science in the context of the global world of universal competition leaves the scientist with a choice of “thinking for himself/herself” only through the moral feat of overcoming the evolving corporate system of abandonment of the ethical standards on which the foundations of science were once erected. In place of the ethos of the scientific era of Enlightenment must come the socially responsible ethos of the science of our day, followed by the ethos of Anthropos, which received its most significant development in the theonomic ethics of Russian religious thinkers. The ethics of Enlightenment, in particular the ethics of Kant’s categorical imperative, not only formed the image of modern technological civilisation, thus shaping the moral foundations of modern science, but still remains in demand owing to the boldness of scientific research, approaching the transcendental boundaries of local life which Kant so innovatively substantiated.

Publisher

EDP Sciences

Subject

General Medicine

Reference13 articles.

1. Berdyaev N., 1991. Self-Knowledge. Experience of Philosophical Autobiography. Moscow: Kniga. (In Rus.)

2. KANT UND DAS PROBLEM DER METAPHYSIK.

3. Cassirer E., 1981. Kant’s Life and Thought. Translated by J. Haden, Introduction by S. Körner. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

4. Kant I., 1996a. An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In: Kant I., 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor M.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15-22.

5. Kant I., 1996b. Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals. In: Kant I., 1996. Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor M.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 37-108.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3